Cognitive Processes, Linguistic Factors, and Arithmetic Word Problem Success: a Review of Behavioral Studies

被引:6
作者
Jaffe, Joshua Benjamin [1 ]
Bolger, Donald Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Human Dev & Quantitat Methodol, 3942 Campus Dr,3304N Benjamin Bldg, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Word problems; Reading comprehension; Linguistic factors; Working memory; Inhibitory control; Educational practices; MATHEMATICS STORY PROBLEMS; PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS; WORKING-MEMORY; IRRELEVANT INFORMATION; INHIBITORY CONTROL; TEXT COMPREHENSION; PROBLEM PERFORMANCE; SEMANTIC STRUCTURE; SCHOOL-CHILDREN; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-023-09821-6
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Arithmetic word problems are a staple in mathematical curricula yet give individuals of all ages difficulty. Successful word problem solving requires translating the problem into a symbolic arithmetic format. However, the linguistic component may make problem solving more complex and increase cognitive load, specifically the processes that interact with reading comprehension, such as working memory and inhibitory control. This comprehensive review examines the overall relationship between comprehension and word problem success, and how different linguistic factors and related cognitive processes impact word problem performance. We highlight the importance of cognitive processes by proposing models that spotlight the roles of inhibitory control and working memory in word problem performance. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for researchers and practitioners to rethink the strategies that are utilized in the development of word problem-solving skills.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Cognitive Processes, Linguistic Factors, and Arithmetic Word Problem Success: a Review of Behavioral Studies
    Joshua Benjamin Jaffe
    Donald Joseph Bolger
    Educational Psychology Review, 2023, 35
  • [2] The interaction of linguistic and arithmetic factors affects adult performance on arithmetic word problems
    Daroczy, Gabriella
    Meurers, Detmar
    Heller, Juergen
    Wolska, Magdalena
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2020, 21 (01) : 105 - 125
  • [3] Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty
    Daroczy, Gabriella
    Wolska, Magdalena
    Meurers, Walt Detmar
    Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [4] Component Processes in Arithmetic Word-Problem Solving and Their Correlates
    Wong, Terry Tin-Yau
    Ho, Connie Suk-Han
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 109 (04) : 520 - 531
  • [5] Arithmetic Word Problems Revisited: Cognitive Processes and Academic Performance in Secondary School
    Duque de Blas, Gonzalo
    Gomez-Veiga, Isabel
    Garcia-Madruga, Juan A.
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [6] A comparison of updating processes in children good or poor in arithmetic word problem-solving
    Passolunghi, Maria Chiara
    Pazzaglia, Francesca
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 15 (04) : 257 - 269
  • [7] The relation between cognitive and emotional factors and arithmetic problem-solving
    Passolunghi, Maria Chiara
    Cargnelutti, Elisa
    Pellizzoni, Sandra
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS, 2019, 100 (03) : 271 - 290
  • [8] The relation between cognitive and emotional factors and arithmetic problem-solving
    Maria Chiara Passolunghi
    Elisa Cargnelutti
    Sandra Pellizzoni
    Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2019, 100 : 271 - 290
  • [9] Understanding linguistic, individual and contextual factors in oral feedback research: A review of empirical studies in L2 classrooms
    Yu, Shulin
    Wang, Bo
    Teo, Timothy
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2018, 24 : 181 - 192
  • [10] The Role of Cognitive Processes, Foundational Math Skill, and Calculation Accuracy and Fluency in Word-Problem Solving Versus Prealgebraic Knowledge
    Fuchs, Lynn S.
    Gilbert, Jennifer K.
    Powell, Sarah R.
    Cirino, Paul T.
    Fuchs, Douglas
    Hamlett, Carol L.
    Seethaler, Pamela M.
    Tolar, Tammy D.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 52 (12) : 2085 - 2098