Humeral torsional side differences after nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures and humeral shaft fractures: clinical and ultrasonographic assessment

被引:2
|
作者
Razaeian, Sam [1 ]
Menzel, Jan-Niklas [2 ]
Zhang, Dafang [3 ]
Krettek, Christian [4 ]
Hawi, Nael [5 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Trauma Surg, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Traumastiftung gGmbH, Hannover Humerus Registry HHR, Carl Neuberg Str 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[5] Orthopaed & Surg Clin Braunschweig OCP, Mauernstr 35, D-38100 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Ultrasonographic humeral torsion; Humeral head retroversion; Proximal humerus fracture; Nonoperative treatment; Humeral shaft fracture; HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY; PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; GUIDELINES; CONSTANT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-023-03671-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe purposes of this study were to investigate (1) sonographic humeral torsion (SHT) and side differences ( increment SHT), and (2) to determine the relationship between SHT and range of rotational motion (RORM) as well as functional outcome scores of nonoperatively treated proximal humerus fractures (PHF) and humeral shaft fractures (HSF).MethodsBetween October 2020 and July 2021, consecutive patients with radiographically healed nonoperatively treated PHF and HSF were included in this analysis. Subjective perception of torsional side difference, correlation between SHT and RORM, Subjective Shoulder Value as well as absolute and adjusted Constant Score were determined. Degree of humeral torsional side differences were classified as follows: 0 degrees-15 degrees: minor; > 15 degrees-30 degrees: moderate; > 30 degrees: major. Factors including gender, hand dominance, fracture type, and displacement were also assessed in order to investigate any association between these variables and increment SHT.ResultsSixty-five patients with nonoperatively treated PHF (n = 47) and HSF (n = 18) were analyzed. Mean follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 2.1-72.6). The majority (80% (52)) resulted in only minor, 15.4% (10) in moderate, and 4.6% (3) in major torsional side differences. Patients with minor or moderate torsional differences did not perceive any subjective side difference. While RORM correlated fairly to highly with functional outcomes, only very low to low correlation was observed between these measures and SHT and increment SHT. Gender, fracture displacement, and type of fracture were not related to SHT and increment SHT. However, significantly greater torsional side differences were observed, when the dominant side was involved (p = 0.026).ConclusionNonoperative early functional treatment of proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures results mainly in only minor humeral torsional side differences. Minor and moderate amounts of torsional side differences might not be perceived by patients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Is MIPO in humeral shaft fractures really safe? Postoperative ultrasonographic evaluation
    Bruno Livani
    William Belangero
    Kleber Andrade
    Guilherme Zuiani
    Raphael Pratali
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 1719 - 1723
  • [12] Interventions for humeral shaft fractures: mixed treatment comparisons of clinical trials
    Y. Zhao
    J. Wang
    W. Yao
    Q. Cai
    Y. Wang
    W. Yuan
    S. Gao
    Osteoporosis International, 2017, 28 : 3229 - 3237
  • [13] Effect of humeral rotation on the reliability of radiographic measurements for proximal humerus fractures
    Sepehri, Aresh
    Stockton, David J.
    Roffey, Darren M.
    Lefaivre, Kelly A.
    Potter, Jeffrey M.
    Guy, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2024, 29 (04) : 1078 - 1084
  • [14] Early displacement of two part proximal humerus fractures treated with intramedullary proximal humeral nail
    Rotman, Dani
    Efrima, Ben
    Yoselevski, Nadav
    Gurel, Ron
    Kazum, Efi
    Maman, Eran
    Goldstein, Yariv
    Chechik, Ofir
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 19 : 59 - 62
  • [15] Functional treatment of the distal third humeral shaft fractures
    Pehlivan, O
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2002, 122 (07) : 390 - 395
  • [16] The role of external fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A retrospective case study review on 85 humeral fractures
    Scaglione, Michelangelo
    Fabbri, Luca
    Omo, Dario Dell'
    Goffi, Andrea
    Guido, Giulio
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (02): : 265 - 269
  • [17] Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review
    Iyengar, Jaicharan J.
    Devcic, Zlatko
    Sproul, Robert C.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 (10) : 612 - 617
  • [18] How to treat stiffness after proximal humeral fractures?
    Rojas, J. Tomas
    Rashid, Mustafa S.
    Zumstein, Matthias A.
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2023, 8 (08) : 651 - 661
  • [19] Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Gracitelli, Mauro E. C.
    Dotta, Thiago A. G.
    Assuncao, Jorge H.
    Malavolta, Eduardo A.
    Andrade-Silva, Fernando B.
    Kojima, Kodi E.
    Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (06) : 1097 - 1102
  • [20] Percutaneous helical plate fixation in humeral shaft fractures with proximal extension
    Videla-Ces, Miquel
    Comas-Aguilar, Marta
    Endemano-Lucio, Amaia
    Sanchez-Naves, Ruben
    Romero-Pijoan, Eudald
    Videla, Sebastian
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54