Effect of different co-foaming agents on PFAS removal from the environment by foam fractionation

被引:36
作者
Buckley, Thomas [1 ]
Karanam, Kavitha [2 ]
Han, Han [1 ]
Vo, Hoang Nhat Phong [2 ]
Shukla, Pradeep [2 ]
Firouzi, Mahshid [3 ]
Rudolph, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Brisbane 4067, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Queensland Alliance Environm Hlth Sci, Brisbane 4067, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Inst Energy & Resources, Newcastle 2308, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Foam fractionation; PFAS; Water treatment; Emerging contaminants; Groundwater; POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; PERFLUOROALKYL; WATER; FATE; ADSORPTION; DIFFUSION; ACIDS; PFOA;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2022.119532
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant, synthetic chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment because of their widespread use in a variety of consumer and industrial products. PFAS contami-nation has become an increasing issue in recent years, which needs to be urgently addressed. Foam fractionation is emerging as a potential remediation option that removes PFAS by adsorption to the surface of rising air bubbles which are removed from the system as a foam. PFAS concentrations in the environment are often not sufficient to allow for formation of a foam by itself and often a co-foaming agent is required to be added to enhance the foamability of the solution. In this study, the effect of different classes of co-foaming agents, anionic, non-ionic, zwitterionic and cationic surfactants on the removal of PFAS with varying fluorocarbon chain length from 3 to 8 in a foam fractionation process have been investigated. Evaluation of the air-water interface parti-tioning coefficient (k') in addition with surface tension and PFAS removal results support the contention that using a co-foaming agent with the opposite charge to the PFAS in question significantly facilitates the adsorption of PFAS to the air-water interface, enhancing the efficiency of the process. Using the non-ionic surfactant (no headgroup electrostatic interaction with PFAS), as a reference, it was observed, in terms of PFAS separation and rate of PFAS removal, that anionic co-surfactant performed worst, zwitterionic was better, and cationic co -surfactant performed best. All of the PFAS species were able to be removed below the limit of detection (0.05 mu g/L) after 45 minutes of foaming time with the cationic surfactant.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Vo P.H.N, 2023, CHEMOSPHERE, V310
  • [42] DIFFUSION IN SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS
    WEINHEIMER, RM
    EVANS, DF
    CUSSLER, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1981, 80 (02) : 357 - 368
  • [43] Woodard S, 2017, REMEDIATION, V27, P19, DOI 10.1002/rem.21515