Research on pricing models for technology-trading platforms with different business models: A two-stage dynamic game model
被引:2
|
作者:
Zhao, Yan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R ChinaBeijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
Zhao, Yan
[1
]
Ni, Yuan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
Lab Bid Date Decis making Green Dev, Beijing 100192, Peoples R ChinaBeijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
Ni, Yuan
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
[3] Lab Bid Date Decis making Green Dev, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
Using the differences in user attribution and profitability among different business models employed by technology-trading platforms, a two-stage dynamic game pricing model was constructed considering three pricing strategies. The research found that (1) in the information-intermediary business model, technology-trading platforms should adopt a two-stage pricing model that first emphasizes transaction fees followed by mixed system charges. (2) In the one-stop service business model, technology-trading platforms can achieve higher returns by comprehensively using big data analysis to tailor mixed fees. (3) The traditional information-intermediary platform can adopt a pricing model with mixed system charges to transition to a one-stop service platform.