Do liberals value emotion more than conservatives? Political partisanship and Lay beliefs about the functionality of emotion

被引:4
|
作者
Choi, Minyoung [1 ]
Karnaze, Melissa M. M. [2 ]
Lench, Heather C. C. [3 ]
Levine, Linda J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family Med & Publ Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, College Stn, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Affect; Politics; Well-being; Social values; Moral values; LIFE; PERSONALITY; EXPERIENCE; ATTITUDES; IDEOLOGY; DISPLAY; HAPPIER;
D O I
10.1007/s11031-022-09997-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Relying on feelings to guide thoughts and plans may be functional from the perspective of the individual but threaten the cohesion of social groups. Thus, liberals, who prioritize caring and fairness for individuals, may view emotion as more functional than do conservatives, who prioritize preserving social groups, hierarchies, and institutions. To test this, participants in three studies (total N = 1,355) rated political partisanship, beliefs about the functionality of emotion, and well-being. Study 3 also assessed how much participants prioritized "individualizing " versus "socially binding " values (Graham et al., 2011). Across all studies, the more liberal participants were, the more they viewed emotion as functional, despite reporting less emotional well-being. In Study 3, the link between liberalism and valuing emotion was mediated by more liberal participants' greater endorsement of individualizing than socially binding values. These results suggest that emotion is viewed as more functional by those who prioritize the needs of individuals, but as less functional by those who prioritize the cohesion of social groups.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 380
页数:17
相关论文
共 5 条