Plasma progastrin-releasing peptide level shows different predictive profiles for treatment response by androgen receptor axis-targeted agents in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
Yashi, Masahiro [1 ,3 ]
Nishihara, Daisaku [1 ]
Yokoyama, Megumi [1 ]
Fuchizawa, Hirotaka [1 ]
Okazaki, Akihito [1 ]
Takei, Kohei [1 ]
Suzuki, Issei [1 ]
Sakamoto, Kazumasa [1 ]
Kijima, Toshiki [1 ]
Kobayashi, Minoru [2 ]
Kamai, Takao [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Urol, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan
[2] Utsunomiya Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Urol, 880 Kitakobayashi, Shimotsuga, Tochigi 3210293, Japan
关键词
androgen receptor axis-targeted agents; castration-resistant prostate cancer; gastrin-releasing peptide; neuroendocrine pathway; progastrin-releasing peptide; NEUROENDOCRINE DIFFERENTIATION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CHROMOGRANIN-A; END-POINTS; MARKERS; CARCINOMAS; ACTIVATION; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; SRC;
D O I
10.1002/cnr2.1762
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe neuroendocrine (NE) pathway cannot be ignored as a mechanism for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression. The neuromediator, gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) may be involved in the aberrant activation of the normal androgen receptor (AR) and increased AR variants. This study focused on plasma levels of progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and examined the treatment outcomes with androgen receptor axis-targeted (ARAT) agents. MethodsOne hundred patients with metastatic CRPC were enrolled. Enzalutamide (ENZ) or abiraterone acetate/prednisone (AA/P) were administered to 50 patients each in a nonrandomized manner as a first-line or later choice. Plasma ProGRP levels were determined using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, and data were collected prospectively. The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and survival estimates. ResultsIn the ENZ series, ProGRP levels correlated with the maximum PSA change from baseline (high ProGRP: -34.5% vs. low ProGRP: -85.7% p = .033). PSA progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic/symptomatic (r/s) PFS, and overall survival (OS) in patients with high ProGRP were significantly worse than those in patients with low ProGRP (median PSA-PFS: 3.3 vs. 10.0 months, p = .001, r/s PFS: 5.0 vs. 15.0 months, p < 0.001, and OS 17.5 vs. 49.0 months, p < .001, respectively). In addition, ProGRP showed an independent predictive value for all survival estimates in multivariate analyses. In the AA/P series, ProGRP levels did not correlate with the PSA change or predict PSA-PFS and r/s PFS, but they maintained a significant difference in OS (19.0 vs. 48.0 months, p = .003). ConclusionsPlasma ProGRP provides a consistent predictive value for OS in metastatic CRPC patients who underwent therapy with ARAT agents. Meanwhile, ProGRP showed different predictive profiles for PSA- and r/s PFS between ENZ and AA/P. These findings clinically suggest a mechanism for CRPC progression involving the NE pathway via the GRP. The underlying mechanism of different predictive profiles by the ARAT agent should be explored in future research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study
    Abida, Wassim
    Campbell, David
    Patnaik, Akash
    Shapiro, Jeremy D.
    Sautois, Brieuc
    Vogelzang, Nicholas J.
    Voog, Eric G.
    Bryce, Alan H.
    McDermott, Ray
    Ricci, Francesco
    Rowe, Julie
    Zhang, Jingsong
    Piulats, Josep Maria
    Fizazi, Karim
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Higano, Celestia S.
    Krieger, Laurence E.
    Ryan, Charles J.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Simmons, Andrew D.
    Loehr, Andrea
    Despain, Darrin
    Dowson, Melanie
    Green, Foad
    Watkins, Simon P.
    Golsorkhi, Tony
    Chowdhury, Simon
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (11) : 2487 - 2496
  • [2] Angelsen A, 1997, PROSTATE, V30, P1
  • [3] Berruti A, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P2590, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2590::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-D
  • [5] Cancer Information Service, 2021, VIT STAT JAP
  • [6] Plasma androgen receptor and serum chromogranin A in advanced prostate cancer
    Conteduca, Vincenza
    Scarpi, Emanuela
    Salvi, Samanta
    Casadio, Valentina
    Lolli, Cristian
    Gurioli, Giorgia
    Schepisi, Giuseppe
    Wetterskog, Daniel
    Farolfi, Alberto
    Menna, Cecilia
    De Lisi, Delia
    Burgio, Salvatore Luca
    Beltran, Himisha
    Attard, Gerhardt
    De Giorgi, Ugo
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [7] Mechanisms and markers of resistance to androgen signaling inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Csizmarik, Anita
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Kramer, Gero
    Nyirady, Peter
    Szarvas, Tibor
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (10) : 728.e13 - 728.e24
  • [8] Plasma neuroendocrine markers in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma
    Cussenot, O
    Villette, JM
    Valeri, A
    Cariou, G
    Desgrandchamps, F
    Cortesse, A
    Meria, P
    Teillac, P
    Fiet, J
    LeDuc, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (04) : 1340 - 1343
  • [9] Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    de Bono, J.
    Mateo, J.
    Fizazi, K.
    Saad, F.
    Shore, N.
    Sandhu, S.
    Chi, K. N.
    Sartor, O.
    Agarwal, N.
    Olmos, D.
    Thiery-Vuillemin, A.
    Twardowski, P.
    Mehra, N.
    Goessl, C.
    Kang, J.
    Burgents, J.
    Wu, W.
    Kohlmann, A.
    Adelman, C. A.
    Hussain, M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (22) : 2091 - 2102
  • [10] Inappropriate activation of the androgen receptor by nonsteroids: Involvement of the Src kinase pathway and its therapeutic implications
    Desai, Sonal J.
    Ma, Ai-Hong
    Tepper, Clifford G.
    Chen, Hong-Wu
    Kung, Hsing-Jien
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (21) : 10449 - 10459