Comparison of Postoperative Safety, Efficacy, and Visual Quality after SMILE for Myopic Patients with Different Corneal Thicknesses

被引:2
作者
Mao, Xiuyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ji, Shunmei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Han [2 ,4 ]
Dai, Jinhui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Eye & ENT Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Myopia, Chinese Acad Med Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Prov Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Corneal thickness; small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE); safety; efficacy; visual quality; INCISION LENTICULE EXTRACTION; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; FUNCTIONAL OPTICAL ZONE; PUPIL SIZE; BIOMECHANICS; SURGERY; ECTASIA; VISION; EYES;
D O I
10.1080/02713683.2022.2117382
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the safety, efficacy, and visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in different corneal thickness patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Methods This prospective cohort study included 191 right eyes of 191 patients. Eyes were divided into three groups according to preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) (Preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was the group indicator.) There were 31 eyes in the thin cornea group (CCT <= 500 um (mu m), TC), 94 eyes in the moderate corneal thickness group (CCT >= 501 um (mu m) and <= 550 um (mu m), MD) and 66 eyes in the thick cornea group (CCT >= 550 um (mu m), TK). Comparisons in uncorrected (UDVA) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE), preoperative mesopic/photopic contrast sensitivity (CS), ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) at a 6mm analytical pupil diameter, and visual quality questionnaires were made (performed) among the three groups during the postoperative six months. Subgroup analyses were made based on preoperative SE. Results The safety indices at six months were 1.15 +/- 0.18, 1.14 +/- 0.17, and 1.18 +/- 0.17, respectively (p = 0.374), and the efficacy indices at six months were 1.07 +/- 0.25, 1.12 +/- 0.22, and 1.11 +/- 0.21, respectively (p = 0.599). The postoperative SE was -0.07 +/- 0.52D, -0.14 +/- 0.38D, and -0.05 +/- 0.46D after SMILE in the three groups, respectively (p = 0.376). No significant difference was found in mesopic/photopic CS, HOAs, and visual quality among different corneal thickness groups and SE groups. Postoperative SE and efficacy indices were the lowest in thin cornea eyes with ultra-high myopia (over -9.00 D). Conclusions SMILE provides comparable safety, efficacy, and visual quality results in different corneal thickness patients. Those with myopia higher than -9.00 D had less efficacy after surgery, especially in thin cornea patients.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 24
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Long-term (5 years) follow-up of small-incision lenticule extraction in mild-to-moderate myopia [J].
Agca, Alper ;
Tulu, Beril ;
Yasa, Dilek ;
Yildirim, Yusuf ;
Yildiz, Burcin K. ;
Demirok, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (04) :421-426
[2]   Theoretical Analysis of the Effect of Pupil Size, Initial Myopic Level, and Optical Zone on Quality of Vision After Corneal Refractive Surgery [J].
Alarcon, Aixa ;
Rubino, Manuel ;
Perez-Ocon, Francisco ;
Jimenez, Jose R. .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 28 (12) :901-905
[3]   Simulated night vision after small-incision lenticule extraction [J].
Ang, Marcus ;
Farook, Mohd ;
Htoon, Hla M. ;
Tan, Donald ;
Mehta, Jodhbir S. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (08) :1173-1180
[4]   Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia [J].
Chen, Xiaoqin ;
Wang, Yan ;
Zhang, Jiamei ;
Yang, Shun-nan ;
Li, Xiaojing ;
Zhang, Lin .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 17
[5]   Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: Is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis? [J].
Dawson, Daniel G. ;
Grossniklaus, Hans E. ;
McCarey, Bernard E. ;
Edelhauser, Henry F. .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 24 (01) :90-96
[6]   Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation [J].
Dong, Zixian ;
Zhou, Xingtao ;
Wu, Jihong ;
Zhang, Zhehuan ;
Li, Tao ;
Zhou, Zimei ;
Zhang, Shenghai ;
Li, Gang .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (02) :263-269
[7]   Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery on Thin Cornea [J].
Fu, Dan ;
Zhao, Yu ;
Zhou, Xingtao .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2021, 46 (02) :168-173
[8]   Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia: a meta-analysis of comparative studies [J].
He, Miao ;
Huang, Wenyong ;
Zhong, Xingwu .
BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 15
[9]   Comparison of effective optical zone after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia [J].
Hou, Jie ;
Wang, Yan ;
Lei, Yulin ;
Zheng, Xiuyun .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (10) :1179-1185
[10]   Clinical outcome of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with moderate to high myopia with thin corneas [J].
Kremer, I ;
Bahar, I ;
Hirsh, A ;
Levinger, S .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (07) :1366-1371