Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation

被引:2
作者
Munari, Cosimo [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Stefan [3 ,4 ]
Wilhelmy, Lutz [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Ctr Finance & Insurance, Dept Banking & Finance, Plattenstr 14, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Swiss Finance Inst, Plattenstr 14, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Leibniz Univ Hannover, House Insurance, Hannover, Germany
[4] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Actuarial & Financial Math, Hannover, Germany
[5] Swiss Re Management Ltd, Grp Risk Management, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
capital requirements; recovery on liabilities; risk measures; solvency regulation; INVARIANT RISK MEASURES; AXIOMATIC APPROACH; LAW-INVARIANT; DETERMINANTS; PREFERENCES; DEFAULT; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/jori.12405
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Protection of creditors is a key objective of financial regulation. Where the protection needs are high, that is, in banking and insurance, regulatory solvency requirements are an instrument to prevent that creditors incur losses on their claims. The current regulatory requirements based on value at risk (V@R) and average value at risk (AV@R) limit the probability of default of financial institutions, but they fail to control the size of recovery on creditors' claims in the case of default. We resolve this failure by developing a novel risk measure, recovery V@R. Our conceptual approach is flexible and allows the construction of general recovery risk measures for various risk management purposes. We provide detailed case studies and applications. We show that recovery risk measures can be used for performance-based management of business divisions of firms and discuss how to calibrate recovery risk measures to historical regulatory standards. Finally, we analyze how recovery risk measures react to the joint distributions of assets and liabilities on firms' balance sheets and compare the corresponding capital requirements with the current regulatory benchmarks based on V@R and AV@R.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 380
页数:52
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] On the coherence of expected shortfall
    Acerbi, C
    Tasche, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (07) : 1487 - 1503
  • [2] The link between default and recovery rates: Theory, empirical evidence, and implications
    Altman, EI
    Brady, B
    Resti, A
    Sironi, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2005, 78 (06) : 2203 - 2227
  • [3] Coherent measures of risk
    Artzner, P
    Delbaen, F
    Eber, JM
    Heath, D
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) : 203 - 228
  • [4] RISK MEASURES AND EFFICIENT USE OF CAPITAL
    Artzner, Philippe
    Delbaen, Freddy
    Koch-Medina, Pablo
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2009, 39 (01): : 101 - 116
  • [5] An Economic Index of Riskiness
    Aumann, Robert J.
    Serrano, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 116 (05) : 810 - 836
  • [6] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 1988, INT CONV CAP MEAS CA
  • [7] Bauer D., 2013, HDB INSURANCE, P863
  • [8] The Marginal Cost of Risk, Risk Measures, and Capital Allocation
    Bauer, Daniel
    Zanjani, George
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 62 (05) : 1431 - 1457
  • [9] Risk bounds for factor models
    Bernard, Carole
    Rueschendorf, Ludger
    Vanduffel, Steven
    Wang, Ruodu
    [J]. FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2017, 21 (03) : 631 - 659
  • [10] Risk aggregation with dependence uncertainty
    Bernard, Carole
    Jiang, Xiao
    Wang, Ruodu
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2014, 54 : 93 - 108