Knotted and knotless double row transosseous equivalent repair techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrate comparable post-operative outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Fox, Michael A. [1 ]
Hughes, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Drain, Nicholas P. [1 ]
Wagala, Nyaluma [1 ]
Patel, Neel [1 ]
Nazzal, Ehab [1 ]
Popchak, Adam [2 ]
Sabsevari, Soheil [2 ]
Lesniak, Bryson P. [1 ]
Lin, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Shoulder Inst, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr, 3471 Fifth Ave,Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Rotator cuff tear; Rotator cuff repair; Transosseous equivalent; Double row; Knotted suture bridge; Knotless tape bridge; Post-surgical outcomes;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07121-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To compare failure rates and outcomes after transosseous equivalent (TOE) double row (DR) knotted suture bridge versus knotless suture tape bridge repair techniques for rotator cuff tears. Methods A consecutive series of 272 shoulders in 256 patients who underwent arthroscopic, double row, TOE repair for full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon were reviewed. Eighty-four shoulders were repaired using knotted suture bridge (KSB) technique, and 188 shoulders were repaired using all knotless suture tape bridge (KTB) technique. Revision procedures and concomitant subscapularis tendon repairs were excluded from analysis. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. Primary outcome was failure of surgical repair, defined as either confirmed retear on MRI and/or need for revision surgery. Secondary clinical outcome measures were assessed including range of motion, strength, visual analog scale (VAS), operative time, subjective shoulder value (SSV), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mental and physical health, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Brophy shoulder activity scores, and need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). Results A total of 127 shoulders (38 KSB and 89 KTB) met inclusion criteria for the study. No significant difference in demographic variables were present between the groups at baseline. Supraspinatus tear size and average follow-up time did not differ significantly between groups. Failure rates were similar between the KSB and KTB repairs (13.1 vs 7.9%, n.s.). There was no significant difference in functional outcomes including strength, range of motion in forward flexion and external rotation, as well as patient reported outcomes including VAS, SSV, PROMIS, ASES, and Brophy scores between the groups. There was also no difference in post-operative stiffness requiring MUA. Conclusion Both KSB and KTB repair techniques demonstrate low retear rates with excellent functional outcomes when compared to pre-operative examination. Both KSB and KTB techniques are viable options for achieving a successful rotator cuff repair.
引用
收藏
页码:1919 / 1924
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Knotless, Interconnected Technique
    Warth, Ryan J.
    Greenspoon, Joshua A.
    Bhatia, Sanjeev
    Millett, Peter J.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 25 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [22] Minimum Five-year Outcomes and Clinical Survivorship for Arthroscopic Transosseous-equivalent Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair
    Pogorzelski, Jonas
    Fritz, Erik M.
    Horan, Marilee P.
    Katthagen, J. Christoph
    Hussain, Zaamin B.
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    Millett, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2019, 27 (24) : E1093 - E1101
  • [23] Correction to: Predictors of outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair in 155 cases: a propensity score weighted analysis of knotted and knotless self-reinforcing repair techniques at a minimum of 2 years
    Peter J. Millett
    Chris Espinoza
    Marilee P. Horan
    Charles P. Ho
    Ryan J. Warth
    Grant J. Dornan
    J. Christoph Katthagen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 1761 - 1761
  • [24] Evaluating transosseous anchorless repair for arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery: a comparative study with double row anchor repair
    Sundar, Shyam
    Sane, Rohit Mahesh
    Sundaramoorthy, Raghulraj
    Ashraf, Munis
    Rajan, David, V
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2025, 28 (01): : 23 - 30
  • [25] Arthroscopic Knotless, Double-Row, Extended Linked Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
    Greenspoon, Joshua A.
    Petri, Maximilian
    Millett, Peter J.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2016, 5 (01): : E127 - E132
  • [26] Initial Fixation Strength of Transosseous-Equivalent Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair Is Comparable With Transosseous Repair
    Behrens, Steve B.
    Bruce, Benjamin
    Zonno, Alan J.
    Paller, David
    Green, Andrew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (01): : 133 - 140
  • [27] Outcomes following arthroscopic transosseous equivalent suture bridge double row rotator cuff repair: a prospective study and short-term results
    Imam, Mohamed Abdelnabi
    Abdelkafy, Ashraf
    SICOT-J, 2016, 2
  • [28] Double Row Double Lamina Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Spencer, Edwin E., Jr.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 8 (03): : 135 - 140
  • [29] Comparison of Passive Stiffness Changes in the Supraspinatus Muscle After Double-Row and Knotless Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: A Cadaveric Study
    Hatta, Taku
    Giambini, Hugo
    Hooke, Alexander W.
    Zhao, Chunfeng
    Sperling, John W.
    Steinmann, Scott P.
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Itoi, Eiji
    An, Kai-Nan
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (10): : 1973 - 1981
  • [30] Transosseous equivalent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using push lock versus conventional double-row fixation.
    Min, K. S.
    Siskosky, M.
    Lee, T. Q.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 55 (01) : S134 - S134