The Parallax: The Possible Errors in the Quantification of Human Decision-Making Behavior in the Experiment of Neuroeconomics-A Perspective From Psychoanalysis

被引:0
作者
Bai, Rui [1 ]
Pan, Weiyu [2 ]
Li, Chao [3 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Dept Situat & Policy Res, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Guangan Vocat & Tech Coll, Sch Econ & Management, Metro Qianjiang Rd Stn Exit D2, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, China Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
neuroeconomics; psychoanalysis; human decision-making behavior; rationality; NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS; CHOICE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1037/tra0001165
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: With the development of neuroscience and technology, economics, which focuses on the selection and decision-making of human behavior, has also entered the field of neuroeconomics. Based on rational biological humans, neuroeconomics assumes that humans are rational biological individuals and behaviors of biological humans can be monitored and quantified in the nervous system through brain imaging technologies such as functional MRI and positron emission tomography. Method: As an emerging discipline, neuroeconomics inevitably encounters obstacles in methodology and epistemology, showing excessive constraints in its understanding of rationality and facing basic conceptual disputes on the theoretical basis of "clear uncertainty monism." In neuroeconomics experiments, measurability will inevitably be traced back to quantification, but when faced with a complex and ever-changing social field, what can be predicted is only probability rather than behavior. Not all human behaviors and decisions can be quantified. Therefore, such research may be biased. Psychoanalysis, a major branch of psychology that is quite similar to neuroeconomics research in subject and object, can greatly correct these basic concepts. Results: Seen from the perspective of psychoanalysis, the existence of these unquantifiable things conversely plays a decisive role and cannot be ignored. Conclusions: This article analyzes the core rational behavior detection of neuroeconomics from the perspective of psychoanalysis and proposes suggestions from the epistemology and methodology of experimental design as well as basic concept discrimination and so forth. Clinical Impact Statement As an emerging discipline, neuroeconomics inevitably encounters obstacles in methodology and epistemology, showing excessive constraints in its understanding of rationality and facing basic conceptual disputes on the theoretical basis of "clear uncertainty monism." This article analyzes the core rational behavior detection of neuroeconomics from the perspective of psychoanalysis and proposes suggestions from the epistemology and methodology of experimental design as well as basic concept discrimination and so forth.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 453
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Manogaran, Gunasekaran
    Gamal, Abduallah
    Smarandache, Florentin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (02)
  • [2] Detection of myocardial infarction based on novel deep transfer learning methods for urban healthcare in smart cities
    Alghamdi, Ahmed
    Hammad, Mohamed
    Ugail, Hassan
    Abdel-Raheem, Asmaa
    Muhammad, Khan
    Khalifa, Hany S.
    Abd El-Latif, Ahmed A.
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 83 (05) : 14913 - 14934
  • [3] From dual processes to multiple selves: Implications for economic behavior
    Alos-Ferrer, Carlos
    Strack, Fritz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 41 : 1 - 11
  • [4] [Anonymous], Sketches of the Criminal World
  • [5] Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting
    Ballard, Kacey
    Knutson, Brian
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 45 (01) : 143 - 150
  • [6] Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction
    Baumgartner, Thomas
    Schiller, Bastian
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    Gianotti, Lorena R. R.
    Knoch, Daria
    [J]. SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (05) : 653 - 660
  • [7] Bennett M.R. Hacker., 2003, Philosophical foundations of neuroscience
  • [8] No Change in Social Decision-Making Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Right Temporoparietal Junction
    Blair-West, Laura F.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Hall, Phillip J.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [9] THE POTENTIAL OF NEUROECONOMICS
    Camerer, Colin F.
    [J]. ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2008, 24 (03) : 369 - 379
  • [10] Secure AF relaying with efficient partial relay selection scheme
    Chu, Shao-, I
    Liu, Bing-Hong
    Ngoc-Tu Nguyen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 32 (15)