Frameworks for multi-system innovation analysis from a sociotechnical perspective: A systematic literature review

被引:3
作者
Bakhuis, Jerico [1 ]
Kamp, Linda Manon [1 ]
Barbour, Natalia [2 ]
Chappin, Emile Jean Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, 12800 Pegasus Dr 211, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Sustainability transition; Multi; -system; Sector coupling; Converging infrastructures; Innovation systems; Multi-level perspective; STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; MULTI-REGIME INTERACTIONS; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS; SECTORAL PATTERNS; POWER-SYSTEM; ELECTRICITY; DYNAMICS; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123266
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper systematically reviews the literature on sociotechnical multi-system innovation frameworks that broaden the usual focus on one sociotechnical system to encompass influences from multiple systems. The review includes 75 peer-reviewed papers that span a broad range of energy-demanding systems and mainly build upon the core frameworks of the Multi-level Perspective (MLP) and Technological Innovation Systems (TIS). The analysis identifies three key aspects to consider in multi-system frameworks. The first aspect is the importance of considering the overarching directionality of multiple sociotechnical systems and how they influence each other. The second is to explicitly analyse the phase of each transitioning system. The third aspect is a need for explicit system configuration analysis. This includes analysing the value chain and the number and types of sectors linked to it, typifying the distinct characteristics of sectors internally and how they interact, and analysing complementary or competitive technologies. The paper concludes by providing recommendations for future research, with a particular focus on the further development of new multi-system frameworks that include one or more of the prior-mentioned three key takeaways. Firstly, focusing on dynamics within multi-system niches. Secondly, performing actor-level analysis, including demand-side analysis. Finally, applying quantitative methods, such as computer simulation modelling.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 141 条
  • [1] The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda
    Andersen, Allan Dahl
    Steen, Markus
    Makitie, Tuukka
    Hanson, Jens
    Thune, Taran M.
    Soppe, Birthe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 34 : 348 - 351
  • [2] Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: How recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories
    Andersen, Allan Dahl
    Markard, Jochen
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, The Paris Agreement
  • [4] Deep decarbonization of urban energy systems through renewable energy and sector-coupling flexibility strategies
    Arabzadeh, Vahid
    Mikkola, Jani
    Jasiunas, Justinas
    Lund, Peter D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 260
  • [5] Arthur W. B., 2009, The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves
  • [6] Asheim B., 1997, EUR PLAN STUD, V5, P299, DOI DOI 10.1080/09654319708720402
  • [7] Inter-sectoral relations to accelerate the formation of technological innovation systems: Determinants of actors' entry into marine renewable energy technologies
    Bento, Nuno
    Fontes, Margarida
    Barbosa, Juliana
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 173
  • [8] Bergek A., 2008, Functions in Innovation Systems: A Framework for Analyzing Energy System Dynamics and Identifying Goals for System-Building Activities by Entrepreneurs and Policy Makers
  • [9] Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis
    Bergek, Anna
    Jacobsson, Staffan
    Carlsson, Bo
    Lindmark, Sven
    Rickne, Annika
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) : 407 - 429
  • [10] Bergek A, 2019, HANDBOOK OF SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION, P200