Budget Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Patients with Early Primary Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Germany

被引:1
|
作者
Lux, Michael Patrick [1 ]
Minartz, Christof [2 ]
Mueller-Huesmann, Harald [3 ]
Sandor, Marianar Felicia [1 ]
Radeck-Knorre, Sabine [2 ]
Neubauer, Aljoscha Steffen [2 ]
机构
[1] St Vincenz Kliniken, Frauenklin St Josefs Krankenhaus, Frauenklin St Louise, Kooperat Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
[2] Inst Hlth & Pharmacoecon IfGPh, Munich, Germany
[3] Klin Hamatol & Onkol, Kooperat Brustzentrum Paderborn, Bruderkrankenhaus St Josef,MVZ Med, Paderborn, Germany
关键词
Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (R) test; Chemotherapy; Budget impact model (costs; cost-effectiveness); Gene expression test; Breast cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000534096
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Gene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend or omit chemotherapy for patients with early HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The benefit of these tests is well established and fully reimbursed by sickness funds for lymph node-negative (pN0) patients in Germany. A budget impact model was built to evaluate the effect of using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (R) test also for node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients. Methods: The prospective randomized clinical trial, RxPONDER, defined conditions (Recurrence Score result 0-25 for postmenopausal patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes) under which omitting chemotherapy does not significantly impact invasive disease-free survival with results currently reported for 5-year follow-up. The present budget impact model calculates average total cost per node-positive patient versus no testing from a sickness funds perspective, taking into account not only the budgetary impact of avoiding chemotherapy and associated side effects, but also the costs of treating those patients who develop distant metastasis. The stability of the results was investigated by probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis. Results: After deducting testing cost, applying the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test yielded an average savings per node-positive patient of EUR 4,272. Without the test costs, the greatest savings resulted from reductions in direct treatment costs and costs arising from the treatment of chemotherapy-related side effects, which together averaged EUR 6,677. The targeted use of chemotherapy after testing also resulted in slightly lower costs for treatment of distant metastasis, if it did occur. The multivariate sensitivity analysis also almost exclusively resulted in cost savings. Conclusion: Analogous to the pN0 situation, this budget impact model demonstrates that the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test can also reduce healthcare costs in Germany in treatment of node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients by minimizing both unnecessary chemotherapy and undertreatment. Additional benefits to patients would include reduced morbidity and improved quality of life for those patients who can safely avoid chemotherapy or undertreatment.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 33
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Management of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer
    Walsh, Elaine M.
    Smith, Karen L.
    Stearns, Vered
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 47 (04) : 187 - 200
  • [12] Predictive and Prognostic Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Hormone Receptor-positive, Node-positive Breast Cancer
    Brufsky, Adam M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (04): : 404 - 410
  • [13] Treatment decisions in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer patients with intermediate oncotype DX recurrence score results
    Fried, Georgeta
    Moskovitz, Mor
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3 : 1 - 8
  • [14] Prognostic Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Among Young Women With Node-Negative and Node-Positive ER-Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
    Poorvu, Philip D.
    Gelber, Shari, I
    Rosenberg, Shoshana M.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Collins, Laura C.
    Peppercorn, Jeffrey
    Schapira, Lidia
    Borges, Virginia F.
    Come, Steven E.
    Warner, Ellen
    Jakubowski, Debbie M.
    Russell, Christy
    Winer, Eric P.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (07) : 725 - +
  • [15] Optimal treatment strategies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Joseph Gligorov
    Jean-Pierre Lotz
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 112 : 53 - 66
  • [16] Budget impact of the Oncotype DX® test compared to other gene expression tests in patients with early breast cancer in Germany
    Lux, M. P.
    Minartz, C.
    Mueller-Huesmann, H.
    Sandor, M. F.
    Herrmann, K. H.
    Radeck-Knorre, S.
    Neubauer, A. S.
    CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 31
  • [17] Optimal treatment strategies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Gligorov, Joseph
    Lotz, Jean-Pierre
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 112 (Suppl 1) : 53 - 66
  • [18] Association between Oncotype DX recurrence score and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI features in patients with estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Chae, Eun Young
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 75 : 131 - 137
  • [19] Association of mammography and ultrasound features with MammaPrint in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Sim, Hayan
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (12) : 1592 - 1600
  • [20] Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer
    Cantini, Luca
    Trapani, Dario
    Guidi, Lorenzo
    Bielo, Luca Boscolo
    Scafetta, Roberta
    Koziej, Marcin
    Vidal, Laura
    Saini, Kamal S.
    Curigliano, Giuseppe
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2024, 123