Developing a multi-criteria prioritization tool to catalyze TOD on publicly owned land areas

被引:3
作者
Cai, Mingming [1 ]
Acolin, Arthur [2 ]
Moudon, Anne Vernez [1 ]
Shen, Qing [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Urban Design & Planning, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Runstad Dept Real Estate, Undergrad Programs Real Estate, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Urban Design & Planning, Interdisciplinary PhD Program Urban Design & Plann, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
TOD; Delphi method; Multi -criteria planning tool; Multi-sources geospatial data; Publicly owned land; TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT; NODE-PLACE MODEL; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; STATION AREAS; TRANSPORT; TRAVEL; INTEGRATION; TYPOLOGY; QUALITY; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2023.104606
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Public agencies can take a leading role in catalyzing TOD by making land available to developers (selling or leasing land, potentially below market prices). In particular, park-and-ride areas that are publicly owned can be leveraged to support TOD uses, such as affordable housing, office space, small businesses, and mixed-use buildings given their convenient access to transit systems and often large land areas. However, few previous studies have discussed the use of publicly owned park-and-rides, which are an important component of publicly owned land, as a catalyst for TOD. To fill the gap in the literature and effectively support TOD planning, this research developed a multi-criteria prioritization tool to identify the most promising locations for TOD and tested it at three park-and-ride sites owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation. The tool was developed through the Delphi process, which is an effective and inexpensive approach to evaluate relevant indicators by synthesizing the opinions of experts from various backgrounds. Five categories with a total of 14 TOD indicators, including transit supportive land-use zoning, job accessibility, land price, land-use mix, and household income, were selected as measures of TOD suitability. The importance of these indicators varied with three different TOD scenarios: (1) emphasis on affordable housing, (2) emphasis on market-rate housing, and (3) emphasis on mixed-use development. Using the calculated suitability scores, this tool can prioritize potential TOD sites for further review.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Are all transit stations equal and equitable? Calculating sustainability, livability, health, & equity performance of smart growth & transit-oriented-development (TOD)
    Appleyard, Bruce S.
    Frost, Alexander R.
    Allen, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2019, 14
  • [2] The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000-2007
    Atkinson-Palombo, Carol
    Kuby, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (02) : 189 - 199
  • [3] Barrieau P., 2019, Transit oriented development and sustainable cities: Economics, community and methods, P80
  • [4] Bertolini Luca., 1999, Planning Practice and Research, V14, P199, DOI DOI 10.1080/02697459915724
  • [5] Bertolini Luca., 1996, European Planning Studies, V4, P331, DOI [10.1080/09654319608720349, DOI 10.1080/09654319608720349, 10.1080/]
  • [6] Bonvino P., 2019, Transit oriented development and sustainable cities: Economics, community and methods, P66
  • [7] Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
    Boulkedid, Rym
    Abdoul, Hendy
    Loustau, Marine
    Sibony, Olivier
    Alberti, Corinne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):
  • [8] California Department of Housing and Community Development, 2021, Surplus Land Act Guidelines
  • [9] Calthorpe P., 1993, NEXT AM METROPOLIS
  • [10] Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2013, TOD priority tool: A resource for identifying TOD opportunities to support high-capacity transit