Study on Key Factors Influencing Coordination Effectiveness of Food Safety Coordinating Body: Lessons from the Chinese Context

被引:0
作者
Niu, Liangyun [1 ]
Wu, Linhai [2 ]
机构
[1] Anyang Normal Univ, Sch Econ, Anyang 455000, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ, Inst Food Safety Risk Management, Wuxi 214122, Peoples R China
关键词
food safety; coordination effectiveness; coordinating body; DANP; China; PUBLIC-SERVICE; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; GOVERNANCE; SECTOR; COLLABORATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.3390/foods13020289
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Many countries have established food safety coordination agencies to strengthen cooperation between government agencies. Due to different national conditions, there are differences in the coordination agencies of different countries, but there are also many similarities. This article studies the key factors influencing the coordination effectiveness of China's food safety coordinating body, so as to enhance interagency collaboration. The results show that the coordination ability of the coordinating body's head, the authority degree of the coordinating body, the clarity degree of the agency's legal responsibility, and the clarity degree of the coordination goal are key factors influencing the coordination effectiveness. The conclusions indicate that the key factors influencing the coordination effectiveness of China's food safety commissions are similar to the key factors in Western countries, without evident differences due to national situations, social systems, and cultures. This article will be useful to policymakers and public sector managers in terms of understanding which key factors influence the coordination effectiveness of coordinating agencies. Moreover, this study provides a perspective for the academic circle from which to understand the main problems faced in the interagency collaborative governance of food safety risks in China.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Determinants of the Success of Cooperative Public Procurement
    Abutabenjeh, Sawsan
    Dimand, Ana-Maria
    Tao, Jie
    [J]. PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 46 (02) : 391 - 417
  • [2] Management control systems in inter-agency collaboration: a case study
    Alam, Manzurul
    Griffiths, Arthur John
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (04) : 289 - 296
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Food Safety
  • [4] How to Carry Out Joined-Up Government Reforms: Lessons from the 2001-2006 Norwegian Welfare Reform
    Askim, Jostein
    Christensen, Tom
    Fimreite, Anne Lise
    Laegreid, Per
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 32 (12) : 1006 - 1025
  • [5] Baldwin R, 2011, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSOBL/9780199576081.001.0001
  • [6] Awareness and Perceptions of Food Safety Risks and Risk Management in Poultry Production and Slaughter: A Qualitative Study of Direct-Market Poultry Producers in Maryland
    Baron, Patrick
    Frattaroli, Shannon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [7] How interagency coordination is affected by agency policy autonomy
    Bjurstrom, Karl Hagen
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 23 (03) : 397 - 421
  • [8] Awakening from the listeriosis crisis: Food safety challenges, practices and governance in the food retail sector in South Africa
    Boatemaa, Sandra
    Barney, McKenna
    Drimie, Scott
    Harper, Julia
    Korsten, Lise
    Pereira, Laura
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2019, 104 : 333 - 342
  • [9] Caduff L., 2006, REV POLICY RES, V23, P153, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.15411338.2006.00190.X
  • [10] Evolutionary Plant Breeding as a Response to the Complexity of Climate Change
    Ceccarelli, Salvatore
    Grando, Stefania
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2020, 23 (12)