共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of taurolidine-citrate in a cohort of patients with intestinal failure receiving home parenteral nutrition
被引:2
|作者:
Williams, Thomas J.
[1
,2
,3
]
Moy, Naomi
[1
]
Kaazan, Patricia
[1
,2
]
Callaghan, Gavin
[1
]
Holtmann, Gerald
[1
,2
]
Martin, Neal
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Herston, Qld, Australia
[3] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 199 Ipswich Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词:
catheter-related bloodstream infections;
costs and cost analysis;
parenteral nutrition;
taurolidine;
BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS;
CATHETER-RELATED INFECTIONS;
LOCK;
PREVENTION;
D O I:
10.1002/jpen.2589
中图分类号:
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生];
TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号:
100403 ;
摘要:
BackgroundCatheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for chronic intestinal failure (CIF) are associated with significant morbidity and financial costs. Taurolidine is associated with a reduction in bloodstream infections, with limited information on the cost-effectiveness as the primary prevention. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of using taurolidine-citrate for the primary prevention of CRBSIs within a quaternary hospital.MethodsAll patients with CIF receiving HPN were identified between January 2015 and November 2022. Data were retrospectively collected regarding patient demographics, HPN use, CRBSI diagnosis, and use of taurolidine-citrate. The direct costs associated with CRBSI-associated admissions and taurolidine-citrate use were obtained from the coding department using a bottom-up approach. An incremental cost-effective analysis was performed, with a time horizon of 4 years, to compare the costs associated with primary and secondary prevention against the outcome of cost per infection avoided.ResultsForty-four patients received HPN within this period. The CRBSI rates were 3.25 infections per 1000 catheter days before the use of taurolidine-citrate and 0.35 infections per 1000 catheter days after taurolidine-citrate use. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio indicates primary prevention is the weakly dominant intervention, with the base case value of $27.04 per CRBSI avoided. This held with one-way sensitivity analysis.ConclusionTaurolidine-citrate in the primary prevention of CRBSIs in patients with CIF receiving HPN is associated with reduced hospital costs and infection rates.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 173
页数:9
相关论文