Modular Compositional Learning Improves 1D Hydrodynamic Lake Model Performance by Merging Process-Based Modeling With Deep Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Ladwig, R. [1 ]
Daw, A. [2 ]
Albright, E. A. [1 ]
Buelo, C. [1 ]
Karpatne, A. [2 ]
Meyer, M. F. [1 ,3 ]
Neog, A. [2 ]
Hanson, P. C. [1 ]
Dugan, H. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Observing Syst Div, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hydrodynamics; lake model; deep learning; knowledge-guided machine learning; water temperature; modular compositional learning; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; WATER TEMPERATURE; SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; ANOXIA;
D O I
10.1029/2023MS003953
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Hybrid Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning (KGML) models, which are deep learning models that utilize scientific theory and process-based model simulations, have shown improved performance over their process-based counterparts for the simulation of water temperature and hydrodynamics. We highlight the modular compositional learning (MCL) methodology as a novel design choice for the development of hybrid KGML models in which the model is decomposed into modular sub-components that can be process-based models and/or deep learning models. We develop a hybrid MCL model that integrates a deep learning model into a modularized, process-based model. To achieve this, we first train individual deep learning models with the output of the process-based models. In a second step, we fine-tune one deep learning model with observed field data. In this study, we replaced process-based calculations of vertical diffusive transport with deep learning. Finally, this fine-tuned deep learning model is integrated into the process-based model, creating the hybrid MCL model with improved overall projections for water temperature dynamics compared to the original process-based model. We further compare the performance of the hybrid MCL model with the process-based model and two alternative deep learning models and highlight how the hybrid MCL model has the best performance for projecting water temperature, Schmidt stability, buoyancy frequency, and depths of different isotherms. Modular compositional learning can be applied to existing modularized, process-based model structures to make the projections more robust and improve model performance by letting deep learning estimate uncertain process calculations. Lake models based on physical processes are powerful tools for investigating how lakes and reservoirs respond to local weather and for projecting lake responses to long-term climate change. Historically, physical processes are the basis for designing these models. Due to an abundance of long-term and high-frequency data, deep learning models are used more frequently, although they do not reflect our domain expertise about hydrodynamics and heat transport. Recently, the modeling community has been focusing on merging models based on physical processes with deep learning. We are highlighting a novel methodology, modular compositional learning (MCL), that merges different modeling types in a modularized framework. Our resulting hybrid model outperformed the original model based on physical processes as well as alternative deep learning models regarding the simulation of various lake variables related to water temperature, and showed physically valid results. We are further showing various ways on how MCL can improve future lake model development and applications. Deep learning models were pretrained on process-based lake water temperature model output and fine-tuned on observed high-frequency dataFine-tuned deep learning model was integrated into process-based model creating the hybrid modelHybrid model outperformed process-based model and two alternative deep learning models in projecting hydrodynamic lake characteristics
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Process-based deep learning model: 3D prediction method for shot peen forming of an aircraft panel
    Wang, Ziyu
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Qun
    Zhou, Lijuan
    Abd Ali, Raneen
    Chen, Wenliang
    Xie, Lingling
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2023, 36 (11) : 500 - 514
  • [2] CLASSIFICATION OF MRI DATA USING DEEP LEARNING AND GAUSSIAN PROCESS-BASED MODEL SELECTION
    Bertrand, Hadrien
    Perrot, Matthieu
    Ardon, Roberto
    Bloch, Isabelle
    2017 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI 2017), 2017, : 745 - 748
  • [3] A hybrid approach to improvement of watershed water quality modeling by coupling process-based and deep learning models
    Jeong, Dae Seong
    Jeong, Heewon
    Kim, Jin Hwi
    Kim, Joon Ha
    Park, Yongeun
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2024, 96 (08)
  • [4] Deconvolution of 1D NMR spectra: A deep learning-based approach
    Schmid, N.
    Bruderer, S.
    Paruzzo, F.
    Fischetti, G.
    Toscano, G.
    Graf, D.
    Fey, M.
    Henrici, A.
    Ziebart, V.
    Heitmann, B.
    Grabner, H.
    Wegner, J. D.
    Sigel, R. K. O.
    Wilhelm, D.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2023, 347
  • [5] Air Pollution Forecasting Using a Deep Learning Model Based on 1D Convnets and Bidirectional GRU
    Tao, Qing
    Liu, Fang
    Li, Yong
    Sidorov, Denis
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 76690 - 76698
  • [6] Model Focus Improves Performance of Deep Learning-Based Synthetic Face Detectors
    Piland, Jacob C.
    Czajka, Adam
    Sweet, Christopher
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 63430 - 63441
  • [7] Analysis of Corn Yield Prediction Potential at Various Growth Phases Using a Process-Based Model and Deep Learning
    Ren, Yiting
    Li, Qiangzi
    Du, Xin
    Zhang, Yuan
    Wang, Hongyan
    Shi, Guanwei
    Wei, Mengfan
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (03):
  • [8] A Prediction Model of Hydrodynamic Landslide Evolution Process Based on Deep Learning Supported by Monitoring Big Data
    Wang, Rubin
    Zhang, Kun
    Qi, Jian
    Xu, Weiya
    Long, Yan
    Huang, Haifeng
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [9] A deep learning algorithm based on 1D CNN-LSTM for automatic sleep staging
    Zhao, Dechun
    Jiang, Renpin
    Feng, Mingyang
    Yang, Jiaxin
    Wang, Yi
    Hou, Xiaorong
    Wang, Xing
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (02) : 323 - 336
  • [10] An ATEM 1D inversion based on K-Means clustering and MLP deep learning
    Shi, Mingzhi
    Cao, Hui
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (04) : 775 - 787