Modular Compositional Learning Improves 1D Hydrodynamic Lake Model Performance by Merging Process-Based Modeling With Deep Learning

被引:2
作者
Ladwig, R. [1 ]
Daw, A. [2 ]
Albright, E. A. [1 ]
Buelo, C. [1 ]
Karpatne, A. [2 ]
Meyer, M. F. [1 ,3 ]
Neog, A. [2 ]
Hanson, P. C. [1 ]
Dugan, H. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Comp Sci, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Observing Syst Div, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hydrodynamics; lake model; deep learning; knowledge-guided machine learning; water temperature; modular compositional learning; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; WATER TEMPERATURE; SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; ANOXIA;
D O I
10.1029/2023MS003953
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Hybrid Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning (KGML) models, which are deep learning models that utilize scientific theory and process-based model simulations, have shown improved performance over their process-based counterparts for the simulation of water temperature and hydrodynamics. We highlight the modular compositional learning (MCL) methodology as a novel design choice for the development of hybrid KGML models in which the model is decomposed into modular sub-components that can be process-based models and/or deep learning models. We develop a hybrid MCL model that integrates a deep learning model into a modularized, process-based model. To achieve this, we first train individual deep learning models with the output of the process-based models. In a second step, we fine-tune one deep learning model with observed field data. In this study, we replaced process-based calculations of vertical diffusive transport with deep learning. Finally, this fine-tuned deep learning model is integrated into the process-based model, creating the hybrid MCL model with improved overall projections for water temperature dynamics compared to the original process-based model. We further compare the performance of the hybrid MCL model with the process-based model and two alternative deep learning models and highlight how the hybrid MCL model has the best performance for projecting water temperature, Schmidt stability, buoyancy frequency, and depths of different isotherms. Modular compositional learning can be applied to existing modularized, process-based model structures to make the projections more robust and improve model performance by letting deep learning estimate uncertain process calculations. Lake models based on physical processes are powerful tools for investigating how lakes and reservoirs respond to local weather and for projecting lake responses to long-term climate change. Historically, physical processes are the basis for designing these models. Due to an abundance of long-term and high-frequency data, deep learning models are used more frequently, although they do not reflect our domain expertise about hydrodynamics and heat transport. Recently, the modeling community has been focusing on merging models based on physical processes with deep learning. We are highlighting a novel methodology, modular compositional learning (MCL), that merges different modeling types in a modularized framework. Our resulting hybrid model outperformed the original model based on physical processes as well as alternative deep learning models regarding the simulation of various lake variables related to water temperature, and showed physically valid results. We are further showing various ways on how MCL can improve future lake model development and applications. Deep learning models were pretrained on process-based lake water temperature model output and fine-tuned on observed high-frequency dataFine-tuned deep learning model was integrated into process-based model creating the hybrid modelHybrid model outperformed process-based model and two alternative deep learning models in projecting hydrodynamic lake characteristics
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Appling AP., 2022, ENCY INLAND WATERS, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00121-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00121-3]
[2]   A manifesto for the equifinality thesis [J].
Beven, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 320 (1-2) :18-36
[3]   A general framework for aquatic biogeochemical models [J].
Bruggeman, Jorn ;
Bolding, Karsten .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 61 :249-265
[4]  
Daw A., 2021, ArXiv
[5]   Application of k-ε turbulence models to enclosed basins:: The role of internal seiches -: art. no. 3230 [J].
Goudsmit, GH ;
Burchard, H ;
Peeters, F ;
Wüest, A .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2002, 107 (C12)
[6]   Calibration and validation of lake surface temperature simulations with the coupled WRF-lake model [J].
Gu, Hongping ;
Jin, Jiming ;
Wu, Yihua ;
Ek, Michael B. ;
Subin, Zachary M. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 129 (3-4) :471-483
[7]   Parameter sensitivity analysis of a 1-D cold region lake model for land-surface schemes [J].
Guerrero, Jose-Luis ;
Pernica, Patricia ;
Wheater, Howard ;
Mackay, Murray ;
Spence, Chris .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (12) :6345-6362
[8]  
Hakanson L., 2009, Encyclopedia of inland waters, P441, DOI [10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00212-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00212-X]
[9]   Predicting lake surface water phosphorus dynamics using process-guided machine learning [J].
Hanson, Paul C. ;
Stillman, Aviah B. ;
Jia, Xiaowei ;
Karpatne, Anuj ;
Dugan, Hilary A. ;
Carey, Cayelan C. ;
Stachelek, Joseph ;
Ward, Nicole K. ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Read, Jordan S. ;
Kumar, Vipin .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 430 (430)
[10]   NEW FORMULATION OF EDDY DIFFUSION THERMOCLINE MODELS [J].
HENDERSONSELLERS, B .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1985, 9 (06) :441-446