Efficient estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters from breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI based on a convolutional neural network for predicting molecular subtypes

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Liangliang [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Ming [3 ]
Li, Lihua [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Anqing Normal Univ, Sch Comp & Informat, Anqing 246133, Peoples R China
[3] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Inst Intelligent Biomed, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
tracer kinetic models; pharmacokinetic parameters; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; convolutional neural network; synthetic data; DCE-MRI; CLUSTER-ANALYSIS; FEATURES; TRACER; MAPS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad0e39
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Tracer kinetic models allow for estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, which are related to pathological characteristics, from breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. However, existing tracer kinetic models subject to inaccuracy are time-consuming for PK parameters estimation. This study aimed to accurately and efficiently estimate PK parameters for predicting molecular subtypes based on convolutional neural network (CNN). Approach. A CNN integrating global and local features (GL-CNN) was trained using synthetic data where known PK parameters map was used as the ground truth, and subsequently used to directly estimate PK parameters (volume transfer constant K-trans and flux rate constant K-ep) map. The accuracy assessed by the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was compared between the GL-CNN and Tofts-based PK parameters in synthetic data. Radiomic features were calculated from the PK parameters map in 208 breast tumors. A random forest classifier was constructed to predict molecular subtypes using a discovery cohort (n = 144). The diagnostic performance evaluated on a validation cohort (n= 64) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared between the GL-CNN and Tofts-based PK parameters. Main results. The average PSNR (48.8884), SSIM (0.9995), andCCC(0.9995) between the GL-CNN-based K-trans map and ground truth were significantly higher than those between the Tofts-based K-trans map and ground truth. The GL-CNN-based K-trans obtained significantly better diagnostic performance (AUCs = 0.7658 and 0.8528) than the Tofts-based K-trans for luminal B and HER2 tumors. The GL-CNN method accelerated the computation by speed approximately 79 times compared to the Tofts method for the whole breast of all patients. Significance. Our results indicate that the GL-CNN method can be used to accurately and efficiently estimate PK parameters for predicting molecular subtypes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Convolutional Neural Networks for Direct Inference of Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Application to Stroke Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Ulas, Cagdas
    Das, Dhritiman
    Thrippleton, Michael J.
    Valdes Hernandez, Maria del C.
    Armitage, Paul A.
    Makin, Stephen D.
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    Menze, Bjoern H.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [2] Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Cho, Nariya
    Song, In Chan
    Kim, Hyeonjin
    Chang, Jung Min
    Yi, Ann
    Yun, Bo La
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (01) : 145 - 151
  • [3] An Efficient Calculation Method for Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Brain Permeability Study Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Wang, Chunhao
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Chang, Zheng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 75 (02) : 739 - 749
  • [4] Radiomic Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Heterogeneity Within Tumor Based on the Unsupervised Decomposition of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Predicting Histological Characteristics of Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Liangliang
    Fan, Ming
    Wang, Shiwei
    Xu, Maosheng
    Li, Lihua
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 55 (06) : 1636 - 1647
  • [5] Unpaired deep learning for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI without AIF measurements
    Oh, Gyutaek
    Moon, Yeonsil
    Moon, Won-Jin
    Ye, Jong Chul
    NEUROIMAGE, 2024, 291
  • [6] Normalizing Flow-Based Distribution Estimation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Fang, Ke
    Wang, Zejun
    Xia, Qi
    Liu, Yingchao
    Wang, Bao
    Cheng, Zhaowei
    Cheng, Jian
    Jin, Xinyu
    Bai, Ruiliang
    Li, Lanjuan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 71 (03) : 780 - 791
  • [7] Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms using pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Quan, Zhiyong
    Huang, Xufang
    Ren, Jing
    Wen, Didi
    Zhang, Guangwen
    Shi, Zhongqiang
    Yin, Hong
    Huan, Yi
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (06) : 8349 - 8356
  • [8] Statistical comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic models in human breast cancer
    Li, Xia
    Welch, E. Brian
    Chakravarthy, A. Bapsi
    Xu, Lei
    Arlinghaus, Lori R.
    Farley, Jaime
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    Kelley, Mark C.
    Meszoely, Ingrid M.
    Means-Powell, Julie
    Abramson, Vandana G.
    Grau, Ana M.
    Gore, John C.
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 68 (01) : 261 - 271
  • [9] 3-T Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Pharmacokinetic Parameters Versus Conventional Kinetic Curve Analysis
    El Khouli, Riham H.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Bluemke, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (06) : 1498 - 1505
  • [10] A Convolutional Neural Network Model for Distinguishing Hemangioblastomas From Other Cerebellar-and-Brainstem Tumors Using Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Sheng, Yaru
    Zhao, Botao
    Cheng, Haixia
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Weiwei
    Yang, Yang
    Ding, Yueyue
    Qiu, Longhua
    Qin, Zhiyong
    Yao, Zhenwei
    Zhang, Xiaoyong
    Ren, Yan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (04) : 1512 - 1520