Control Barrier Functions and Input-to-State Safety With Application to Automated Vehicles

被引:25
作者
Alan, Anil [1 ]
Taylor, Andrew J. [2 ]
He, Chaozhe R. R. [3 ,4 ]
Ames, Aaron D. [2 ]
Orosz, Gabor [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] CALTECH, Dept Comp & Math Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Navistar Inc, Lisle, IL 60532 USA
[4] Plus Ai Inc, Santa Clara, CA 95014 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Connected automated vehicles (CAVs); control barrier functions (CBFs); input-to-state safety (ISSf); robust safety-critical control; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2023.3286090
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Balancing safety and performance is one of the predominant challenges in modern control system design. Moreover, it is crucial to robustly ensure safety without inducing unnecessary conservativeness that degrades performance. In this work, we present a constructive approach for safety-critical control synthesis via control barrier functions (CBFs). By filtering a hand-designed controller via a CBF, we are able to attain performant behavior while providing rigorous guarantees of safety. In the face of disturbances, robust safety and performance are simultaneously achieved through the notion of input-to-state safety (ISSf). We take a tutorial approach by developing the CBF-design methodology in parallel with an inverted pendulum example, making the challenges and sensitivities in the design process concrete. To establish the capability of the proposed approach, we consider the practical setting of safety-critical design via CBFs for a connected automated vehicle (CAV) in the form of a class-8 truck without a trailer. Through experimentation, we see the impact of unmodeled disturbances in the truck's actuation system on the safety guarantees provided by CBFs. We characterize these disturbances and using ISSf, produce a robust controller that achieves safety without conceding performance. We evaluate our design both in simulation, and for the first time on an automotive system, experimentally.
引用
收藏
页码:2744 / 2759
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Agrawal A, 2017, ROBOTICS: SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS XIII
  • [2] Safe Control Synthesis via Input Constrained Control Barrier Functions
    Agrawal, Devansh R.
    Panagou, Dimitra
    [J]. 2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 6113 - 6118
  • [3] Safe Controller Synthesis With Tunable Input-to-State Safe Control Barrier Functions
    Alan, Anil
    Taylor, Andrew J.
    He, Chaozhe R.
    Orosz, Gabor
    Ames, Aaron D.
    [J]. IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2022, 6 : 908 - 913
  • [4] Ames AD, 2019, 2019 18TH EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), P3420, DOI [10.23919/ecc.2019.8796030, 10.23919/ECC.2019.8796030]
  • [5] Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems
    Ames, Aaron D.
    Xu, Xiangru
    Grizzle, Jessy W.
    Tabuada, Paulo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2017, 62 (08) : 3861 - 3876
  • [6] Ames AD, 2014, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P6271, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2014.7040372
  • [7] Blanchini F, 2008, SYST CONTROL-FOUND A, P1
  • [8] Boyd S., 2004, Convex Optimization, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511804441, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804441]
  • [9] Robust Control Barrier Functions With Sector-Bounded Uncertainties
    Buch, Jyot
    Liao, Shih-Chi
    Seiler, Peter
    [J]. IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2022, 6 : 1994 - 1999
  • [10] Robust Control Barrier-Value Functions for Safety-Critical Control
    Choi, Jason J.
    Lee, Donggun
    Sreenath, Koushil
    Tomlin, Claire J.
    Herbert, Sylvia L.
    [J]. 2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 6814 - 6821