U.S. adult viewers of information treatments express overall positive views but some concerns about gene editing technology

被引:0
作者
Stofer, Kathryn A. [1 ]
Turner, Savanna [2 ]
Rumble, Joy [3 ]
McFadden, Brandon [4 ]
Folta, Kevin [5 ]
Jeevan, Adithi [6 ]
Ouncap, Tracy [6 ]
Hecht, Kirsten [2 ]
Cummins, Cierra [6 ]
Thiel, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agr Educ & Commun, STEM Educ & Outreach, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Agr Educ & Commun, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Agr Commun Educ & Leadership, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Tyson Endowed Chair Food Policy Econ, Fayetteville, AR USA
[5] Univ Florida, Hort Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION | 2023年 / 22卷 / 04期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Public engagement with science and technology; Public perception of science and technology; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED FOOD; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; TRUST; VACCINES; VIRUSES; SCIENCE; CRISPR;
D O I
10.22323/2.22040202
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Gene editing techniques (GET) may add precision and speed to the genetic improvement process. However, some adults remain skeptical. We examined U.S. consumer sentiment and concerns about foods derived from GET following information treatments. Randomly assigned participants viewed either: an industry-based video, a food blogger video, or a written article. We coded sentiment and themes of open-ended survey responses. Most responses were in favor of GET after intervention; the industry video produced the most negative attitudes; and technical benefits, concerns, and effects emerged among themes. Our research will help design engagement to boost consumer understanding of GET risks and benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Learning without seeking?: Incidental exposure to science news on social media & knowledge of gene editing
    Anderson, Joshua T. L.
    Howell, Emily L.
    Xenos, Michael A.
    Scheufele, Dietram A.
    Brossard, Dominique
    [J]. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (04): : 1 - 22
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, SCI TECHNOLOGY PUBLI
  • [3] Baker Reg., 2013, Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling
  • [4] American Scientists' Willingness to Use Different Communication Tactics
    Besley, John C.
    Newman, Todd P.
    Dudo, Anthony
    Tiffany, Leigh Anne
    [J]. SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 43 (04) : 486 - 507
  • [5] Values Determine the (In) Effectiveness of Informational Interventions in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior
    Bolderdijk, Jan Willem
    Gorsira, Madelijne
    Keizer, Kees
    Steg, Linda
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [6] Dimensions of trust in different forms of science communication: the role of information sources and channels used to acquire science knowledge
    Brondi, Sonia
    Pellegrini, Giuseppe
    Guran, Peter
    Fero, Martin
    Rubin, Andrea
    [J]. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (03): : 1 - 21
  • [7] Bultitude K, 2012, JCOM-J SCI COMMUN, V11
  • [8] Examining the relationship between gene editing knowledge, value predispositions, and general science attitudes among U.S. farmers, scientists, policymakers, and the general public
    Calabrese, Christopher
    Featherstone, Jieyu Ding
    Robbins, Matthew
    Barnett, George A.
    [J]. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2021, 20 (02): : 1 - 17
  • [9] Campbell DT., 1963, Handbook of Research on Teaching, P171
  • [10] Chazdon S, 2016, J EXT, V54