The experience of shared decision-making for patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families-A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Mcpeake, Mari-Louise [1 ,4 ]
Cook, Neal [1 ]
Mcilfatrick, Sonja [2 ]
Hasson, Felicity [3 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Londonderry, North Ireland
[2] Ulster Univ, Doctoral Coll, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Belfast, North Ireland
[4] Ulster Univ, Fac Life & Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Paramed Sci, Magee Campus, Londonderry BT48 7JL, North Ireland
关键词
end-stage kidney disease; family; caregivers; haemodialysis people; shared decision-making; DIALYSIS; CARE; PERSPECTIVES; TRANSPLANTATION; CHOICE; HEALTH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16766
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo identify the experiences of shared decision-making (SDM) for adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members. DesignA scoping literature review. MethodA scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. Data sourcesMedline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis-scoping review extension (PRISMA-Scr). ResultsThirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition. ConclusionPeople with end-stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient-driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life. Implications for clinical practiceThis review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision-making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process. Patient and Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:6243 / 6253
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shared Decision-Making in Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review
    Kooijman, Maria-Annette
    van Leeuwen, Goudje L.
    Schuurmann, Richte C. L.
    van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    van der Wal-huisman, Hanneke
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 112 : 193 - 221
  • [22] Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia
    Jox, Ralf J.
    Denke, Eva
    Hamann, Johannes
    Mendel, Rosmarie
    Foerstl, Hans
    Borasio, Gian Domenico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27 (10) : 1045 - 1052
  • [23] Healthcare professional education in shared decision making in the context of chronic kidney disease: a scoping review
    Meijers, Bjorn
    Wellekens, Karolien
    Montomoli, Marco
    Altabas, Karmela
    Geter, Jessica
    McCarthy, Kate
    Lobbedez, Thierry
    Kazancioglu, Rumeyza
    Thomas, Nicola
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [24] The cardiovascular determinants of physical function in patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
    Adenwalla, Sherna F.
    Billany, Roseanne E.
    March, Daniel S.
    Gulsin, Gaurav S.
    Young, Hannah M. L.
    Highton, Patrick
    Churchward, Darren C.
    Young, Robin
    Careless, Alysha
    Tomlinson, Clare L.
    McCann, Gerry P.
    Burton, James O.
    Graham-Brown, Matthew P. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 37 (04) : 1405 - 1414
  • [25] Evaluation of the literature surrounding shared decision-making in elective rhinological surgery: A scoping review
    Karadaghy, Omar A.
    Vukas, Rachel R.
    Villwock, Jennifer A.
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2021, 48 (05) : 922 - 927
  • [26] Factors Associated with Burden in Caregivers of Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (A Systematic Review)
    Alshammari, Bushra
    Noble, Helen
    McAneney, Helen
    Alshammari, Farhan
    O'Halloran, Peter
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [27] Cost-benefit analysis of haemodialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease in Abuja, Nigeria
    Agada-Amade, Yakubu Adole
    Ogbuabor, Daniel Chukwuemeka
    Obikeze, Eric
    Eboreime, Ejemai
    Onwujekwe, Obinna Emmanuel
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [28] Shared decision-making in end-stage renal disease: a protocol for a multi-center study of a communication intervention to improve end-of-life care for dialysis patients
    Eneanya, Nwamaka D.
    Goff, Sarah L.
    Martinez, Talaya
    Gutierrez, Natalie
    Klingensmith, Jamie
    Griffith, John L.
    Garvey, Casey
    Kitsen, Jenny
    Germain, Michael J.
    Marr, Lisa
    Berzoff, Joan
    Unruh, Mark
    Cohen, Lewis M.
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
  • [29] Shared decision-making in advanced chronic kidney disease in the elderly
    Heras Benito, Manuel
    Fernandez-Reyes Luis, Maria Jose
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2019, 152 (05): : 188 - 194
  • [30] What to do with foundation therapies for heart failure for patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis
    Adenwalla, Sherna F.
    Hull, Katherine L.
    Graham-Brown, Matthew P. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 85 (04)