Genetic programming-based backbone curve model of reinforced concrete walls

被引:1
作者
Ma, Gao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yao [1 ]
Hwang, Hyeon-Jong [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Key Lab Damage Diag Engn Struct Hunan Prov, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Konkuk Univ, Sch Architecture, Seoul 05029, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reinforced concrete wall; Machine learning; SHAP; Symbolic regression; Backbone curve; SEISMIC BEHAVIOR; LOAD BEHAVIOR; STRENGTH; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115824
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Backbone curve, as a nonlinear response analysis method, can be used for performance assessment of residual resistance and performance prediction during the preliminary design of structures. In this study, a backbone curve model of reinforced concrete (RC) walls based on Genetic programming-based symbolic regression (GP-SR) was proposed, which can help to quickly evaluate the bearing capacity and seismic performance of RC walls. Unlike the black-box characteristic of traditional machine learning models, the GP-SR method can give explicit computational equations, which are more interpretable and easier to be used by researchers and engineers. Experimental data of 388 existing RC walls were used for feature selection, model training, and comparison with the modeling method of ASCE 41-17 to verify its effectiveness for modeling the backbone curves of RC walls with four failure modes (i.e., flexure, flexure-shear, shear, and shear-sliding). The results showed that the accuracy of the GP-SR model was better than that of the prediction of ASCE 41-17. Overall, the GP-SR model described well the backbone curves of RC walls with various design conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] ACI committee 318, 2014, BUILDING CODE REQUIR
  • [2] Effect of axial loads in the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete walls with unconfined wall boundaries
    Alarcon, C.
    Hube, M. A.
    de la Llera, J. C.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 73 : 13 - 23
  • [3] New nonlinear dynamic response model of squat/slender flanged/non-flanged reinforced concrete walls
    Allouzi, Rabab
    Alkloub, Amer
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2018, 19 (02) : 582 - 596
  • [4] American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, 4117 ASCE ASCESEI
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, PRESTANDARD COMMENTA
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, 32010 JGJ
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, Concrete Structures Standard, Part 1: The Design of Concrete Structures: Part 2: Commentary on the Design of Concrete Structures
  • [8] Genetic programming based symbolic regression for shear capacity prediction of SFRC beams
    Ben Chaabene, Wassim
    Nehdi, Moncef L.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2021, 280
  • [9] Birely A.C., 2012, SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
  • [10] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32