Experiences using a progestin-only pill in an over-the-counter environment in the United States: a cross-sectional survey

被引:8
作者
Grindlay, Kate [1 ]
Key, Katherine [1 ]
Zuniga, Carmela [1 ]
Wollum, Alexandra [2 ]
Grossman, Daniel [3 ]
Blanchard, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
[2] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Bixby Ctr Global Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Adv New Stand Reprod Hlth ANSIRH, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
Contraceptive Agents; Female; contraceptives; oral; family planning policy; Health Policy; hormonal contraception; Reproductive Health; CONTRACEPTIVE PILLS; ACCESS; CONTRAINDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201637
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Background Efforts are underway to make a progestin-only pill (POP) over the counter (OTC) in the United States (US); however, little is known about POP user experiences, which could impact uptake and continuation. Methods From January 2020-September 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey with individuals who used OTC POPs in a US trial. We calculated descriptive statistics and Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to assess menstrual bleeding acceptability, how OTC POP experiences compared with prior contraceptive methods, and preferred ways to get answers to questions during OTC POP use. Results Among 550 adult and 115 adolescent participants, 80% (n=531) felt their menstrual bleeding was acceptable. Participants reported a range of menstrual bleeding experiences compared with prior long-acting or hormonal methods used; 58% (n=84) said the POP bleeding was similar or better and 36% (n=53) said it was worse. Among participants who used contraception in the month prior to the trial, 77% (n=201) said their overall OTC POP experience was similar or better. Top benefits compared with prior methods included less worry about pregnancy, ease of access, fewer side effects, and greater decision-making power. Adults preferred to get answers about OTC POPs via webpage or app, whereas teens preferred asking pharmacists or other healthcare providers. Conclusions Overall, OTC POP users in a trial setting found the menstrual bleeding acceptable and the method similar to or better than previous methods. POP labelling should provide clear messaging about bleeding changes users may experience.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Over-the-Counter Access to Hormonal Contraception [J].
Isley, Michelle ;
Allen, Rebecca H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (04) :E96-E105
[2]  
Bartz D., 2011, CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNO
[3]   Confidentiality in Family Planning Services for Young People A Systematic Review [J].
Brittain, Anna W. ;
Williams, Jessica R. ;
Zapata, Lauren B. ;
Moskosky, Susan B. ;
Weik, Tasmeen S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02) :S85-S92
[4]  
Clinicaltrials.gov, ADH CONT DOS OR CONT
[5]  
Crockett E., 1 STEPS OVER THE COU
[6]   US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016 [J].
Curtis, Kathryn M. ;
Tepper, Naomi K. ;
Jatlaoui, Tara C. ;
Berry-Bibee, Erin ;
Horton, Leah G. ;
Zapata, Lauren B. ;
Simmons, Katharine B. ;
Pagano, H. Pamela ;
Jamieson, Denise J. ;
Whiteman, Maura K. .
MMWR RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS, 2016, 65 (03) :1-103
[7]  
Dean G., 2011, CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNO
[8]   Prevalence of contraindications to progestin-only contraceptive pills in a multi-institution patient database [J].
Dutton, Caryn ;
Kim, Renita ;
Janiak, Elizabeth .
CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 103 (05) :367-370
[9]   Adolescents' and Young Adults' Reports of Barriers to Confidential Health Care and Receipt of Contraceptive Services [J].
Fuentes, Liza ;
Ingerick, Meghan ;
Jones, Rachel ;
Lindberg, Laura .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2018, 62 (01) :36-43
[10]   A review of the effectiveness of a progestogen-only pill containing norgestrel 75 μg/day [J].
Glasier, Anna ;
Sober, Stephanie ;
Gasloli, Robin ;
Goyal, Anupam ;
Laurora, Irene .
CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 105 :1-6