Investigations of methods for multiple time-to-event endpoints: A chronic myeloid leukemia data analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Hongji [1 ]
Hou, Yawen [2 ]
Chen, Zheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Trop Dis Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Econ, Dept Stat, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
clinical importance; composite endpoint; hazard ratio; multiple endpoints; single endpoint; win ratio; HAZARD RATIOS; WIN RATIO; RISKS;
D O I
10.1111/jep.13752
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In randomized controlled trials, multiple time-to-event endpoints are commonly used to determine treatment effects. However, choosing an appropriate method to address multiple endpoints, according to different purposes of clinical practice, is a challenge for researchers. Methods We applied single endpoint, composite endpoint and win ratio analysis to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) data to illustrate the distinctions with different multiple endpoints, including relapse, recovery and death after transplantation. Results Regarding relapse and death, the hazard ratio in single endpoint analysis (HRs) were 1.281 (95% CI: 1.061-1.546) and hazard ratio in composite endpoint analysis (HRc) were 1.286 (95% CI: 1.112-1.486) and 1/WR (win ratio) was 1.292 (95% CI: 1.115-1.497) indicated a similar negative effect for non-prophylaxis patients. However, when considering recovery and death, the corresponding HRs = 1.280 (95% CI: 1.056-1.552) may not be enough to describe the effect on death with nonproportional hazards (p < 0.05), and for the composite endpoint analysis, the HRc = 0.828 (95% CI: 0.740-0.926) cannot quantify and interpret the clinical effect on the composite endpoint with the combination of recovery and death, while the 1/WR = 1.351 (95% CI: 1.207-1.513) showed an unfavourable effect for non-prophylaxis patients Conclusions When dealing with multiple endpoints, single endpoints, researchers may choose single endpoints, composite endpoints and WR analysis due to different clinical applications and purposes. However, both single and composite endpoint analyses are hazard-based measures, and thus, the proportional hazards assumption should be considered. Moreover, composite endpoint analysis should be applied for endpoints with similar clinical meanings but not opposing implications. Win ratio analysis can be considered for different clinical importance of multiple endpoints, but the meaning of 'winner' needs to be specified for desired or undesired endpoints.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficient analysis of time-to-event endpoints when the event involves a continuous variable crossing a threshold
    Lin, Chien-Ju
    Wason, James M. S.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2020, 208 : 119 - 129
  • [32] Time-to-Event Analysis
    Tolles, Juliana
    Lewis, Roger J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (10): : 1046 - 1047
  • [33] Guidelines for time-to-event endpoints in gastrointestinal cancer using real-world data
    Vissers, P.
    Elferink, M. A. G.
    Bonsing, B.
    Vandergeest, L.
    Koopman, M.
    van Laarhoven, H. W. M.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, G.
    van Rossum, P. S. N.
    Sijtsma, F. P. C.
    Vink, G. R.
    de vos-Geelen, J.
    Wilmink, H.
    Dewilt, H.
    Verhoeven, R. H. A.
    van Erning, F. N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S207 - S207
  • [34] Time-to-event analysis
    Debanne, SM
    Rowland, DY
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) : 458 - 459
  • [35] Immortal Time Bias in the Analysis of Time-to-Event Data in Orthopedics
    Larson, Dirk R.
    Crowson, Cynthia S.
    Devick, Katrina L.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    Kremers, Hilal Maradit
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (10): : 3372 - 3377
  • [36] Response to: Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
    Yu Wang
    Tingting Zeng
    Trials, 14
  • [37] Response to: Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
    Wang, Yu
    Zeng, Tingting
    TRIALS, 2013, 14
  • [38] A comparison of estimation methods adjusting for selection bias in adaptive enrichment designs with time-to-event endpoints
    Di Stefano, Fulvio
    Pannaux, Matthieu
    Correges, Anne
    Galtier, Stephanie
    Robert, Veronique
    Saint-Hilary, Gaelle
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (10) : 1767 - 1779
  • [39] Meta-analysis of time-to-event data: a comparison of two-stage methods
    Simmonds, Mark C.
    Tierney, Jayne
    Bowden, Jack
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2011, 2 (03) : 139 - 149