Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds

被引:1
作者
Guigon, Laureline [1 ]
Sanchez, Laura X. Gil [1 ]
Petit, Anne-Sophie [2 ]
Le Bonniec, Alice [1 ]
Basu, Partha [1 ]
Rodrigue, Christelle M. [3 ]
Preau, Marie [2 ]
Soler-Michel, Patricia [3 ]
Villain, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc IARC WHO, Early Detect Prevent & Infect EPR Branch, 25 Ave Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lumiere Lyon, Unite Inserm, Radiat Def Sante Environm 1296, Lyon, France
[3] Ctr Reg Coordinat Depistages Canc CRCDC Auvergne R, Site Rhone & Metropole Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne Rhone, France
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Decision aid; France; Informed choice; Socioeconomic; Women; Shared decision-making; Focus group; PRIMARY-CARE; AIDS; STANDARDS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo inform the development of an online tool to be potentially used in shared decision-making about breast cancer screening, French women were questioned about participation in breast cancer screening, the health professional's role, and their perceptions of the proposed tool.MethodsWe organised focus group discussions with 55 French women. Two different strategies were used to recruit women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. We applied both inductive and deductive approaches to conduct a thematic analysis of the discussions. We analysed the responses by using the main determinants from different health behaviour models and compared the two groups.ResultsIndependently of socioeconomic status, the most important determinant for a woman's participation in breast cancer screening was the perceived severity of breast cancer and the perceived benefits of its early detection by screening. Cues to action reported by both groups were invitation letters; recommendations by health professionals, or group/community activities and public events were reported by women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds, respectively. Among other positive determinants, women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported making informed decisions and receiving peer support whereas women from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported community empowerment through group/community events. Fear of cancer was reported as a barrier in both groups. Among other barriers, language issues were reported only by women from low socioeconomic backgrounds; women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported breast cancer screening-related risks other than overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment. Barriers to accessing the online tool to be developed were mainly reported by women from high socioeconomic backgrounds.ConclusionLimitations in implementing shared decision-making for women from low socioeconomic backgrounds were highlighted. An online tool that is suitable for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status, would provide "on-demand" reliable and tailored information about breast cancer screening and improve access to health professionals and social exchanges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[21]   Toward Minimum Standards for Certifying Patient Decision Aids: A Modified Delphi Consensus Process [J].
Joseph-Williams, Natalie ;
Newcombe, Robert ;
Politi, Mary ;
Durand, Marie-Anne ;
Sivell, Stephanie ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Volk, Robert J. ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Bennett, Carol ;
Pignone, Michael ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (06) :699-710
[22]  
Jusot F., 2016, Rev Fr Dconomie, V31, P109, DOI [10.3917/rfe.164.0109, DOI 10.3917/RFE.164.0109]
[23]   Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women? [J].
Kalecinski, Julie ;
Regnier-Denois, Veronique ;
Ouedraogo, Samiratou ;
Dabakuyo-Yonli, Tienhan Sandrine ;
Dumas, Agnes ;
Arveux, Patrick ;
Chauvin, Franck .
SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2015, 27 (02) :213-220
[24]   Shedding light on the psychological and behavioral determinants of travel mode choice: A meta-analysis [J].
Lanzini, Pietro ;
Khan, Sana Akbar .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 48 :13-27
[25]   Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model [J].
Legare, France ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Pouliot, Sophie ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pierre ;
Desroches, Sophie ;
Kryworuchko, Jennifer ;
Dunn, Sandy ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Frosch, Dominick ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Harrison, Margaret B. ;
Pluye, Pierre ;
Graham, Ian D. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2011, 25 (01) :18-25
[26]   Clinical and psychosocial constructs for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening participation: A systematic review [J].
Lemmo, Daniela ;
Martino, Maria Luisa ;
Vallone, Federica ;
Donizzetti, Anna Rosa ;
Freda, Maria Francesca ;
Palumbo, Francesco ;
Lorenzo, Elvira ;
D'Argenzio, Angelo ;
Caso, Daniela .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 23 (02)
[27]   Getting on the same page: Communication, patient involvement and shared understanding of "decisions" in oncology [J].
Leppin, Aaron L. ;
Kunneman, Marleen ;
Hathaway, Julie ;
Fernandez, Cara ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Tilburt, Jon C. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) :110-117
[28]   Practice theoretical approach on the reasons why target group women refrain from taking breast cancer screening [J].
Lubi, Kadi ;
Savicka, Vita ;
Koor, Marilyn ;
Nool, Irma ;
Tupits, Mare ;
Mets-Oja, Silja .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (12) :3053-3058
[29]   Systematic reviews as a "lens of evidence": Determinants of participation in breast cancer screening [J].
Mandrik, O. ;
Tolma, E. ;
Zielonke, N. ;
Meheus, F. ;
Ordonez-Reyes, C. ;
Severens, J. L. ;
Murillo, R. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2021, 28 (02) :70-79
[30]  
Marteau T M, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P99, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x