Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds

被引:1
作者
Guigon, Laureline [1 ]
Sanchez, Laura X. Gil [1 ]
Petit, Anne-Sophie [2 ]
Le Bonniec, Alice [1 ]
Basu, Partha [1 ]
Rodrigue, Christelle M. [3 ]
Preau, Marie [2 ]
Soler-Michel, Patricia [3 ]
Villain, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Agcy Res Canc IARC WHO, Early Detect Prevent & Infect EPR Branch, 25 Ave Tony Garnier, F-69007 Lyon, France
[2] Univ Lumiere Lyon, Unite Inserm, Radiat Def Sante Environm 1296, Lyon, France
[3] Ctr Reg Coordinat Depistages Canc CRCDC Auvergne R, Site Rhone & Metropole Lyon, Lyon, Auvergne Rhone, France
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Decision aid; France; Informed choice; Socioeconomic; Women; Shared decision-making; Focus group; PRIMARY-CARE; AIDS; STANDARDS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo inform the development of an online tool to be potentially used in shared decision-making about breast cancer screening, French women were questioned about participation in breast cancer screening, the health professional's role, and their perceptions of the proposed tool.MethodsWe organised focus group discussions with 55 French women. Two different strategies were used to recruit women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. We applied both inductive and deductive approaches to conduct a thematic analysis of the discussions. We analysed the responses by using the main determinants from different health behaviour models and compared the two groups.ResultsIndependently of socioeconomic status, the most important determinant for a woman's participation in breast cancer screening was the perceived severity of breast cancer and the perceived benefits of its early detection by screening. Cues to action reported by both groups were invitation letters; recommendations by health professionals, or group/community activities and public events were reported by women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds, respectively. Among other positive determinants, women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported making informed decisions and receiving peer support whereas women from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported community empowerment through group/community events. Fear of cancer was reported as a barrier in both groups. Among other barriers, language issues were reported only by women from low socioeconomic backgrounds; women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported breast cancer screening-related risks other than overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment. Barriers to accessing the online tool to be developed were mainly reported by women from high socioeconomic backgrounds.ConclusionLimitations in implementing shared decision-making for women from low socioeconomic backgrounds were highlighted. An online tool that is suitable for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status, would provide "on-demand" reliable and tailored information about breast cancer screening and improve access to health professionals and social exchanges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Empowering the poor: A field study of the social psychological consequences of receiving autonomy or dependency aid in Panama
    Alvarez, Katherina
    van Leeuwen, Esther
    Montenegro-Montenegro, Esteban
    van Vugt, Mark
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 57 (02) : 327 - 345
  • [2] What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France
    Amelie, Aim-Eusebi
    Ruelle, Yannick
    Freche, Bernard
    Houllemare, Melanie
    Bonillo, Aurelie
    Bouaziz, Laurie
    Rat, Cedric
    Gocko, Xavier
    Cerisey, Catherine
    Aubin-Auger, Isabelle
    Ferrat, Emilie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Report of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent on its Mission to the United States of America
  • [4] Autier Philippe, 2013, Rev Prat, V63, P1369
  • [5] Cases C, 2016, Rapport du comite d'orientation
  • [6] Social relationships and health
    Cohen, S
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 59 (08) : 676 - 684
  • [7] A systematic development process for patient decision aids
    Coulter, Angela
    Stilwell, Diana
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [8] Breast cancer screening programme participation and socioeconomic deprivation in France
    Deborde, Therese
    Chatignoux, Edouard
    Quintin, Cecile
    Beltzer, Nathalie
    Hamers, Francoise F.
    Rogel, Agnes
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 115 : 53 - 60
  • [9] Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Carpenter, Lewis
    Dolan, Hayley
    Bravo, Paulina
    Mann, Mala
    Bunn, Frances
    Elwyn, Glyn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [10] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419