Assessing atrial myopathy with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in embolic stroke of undetermined source

被引:2
|
作者
Papapostolou, Stavroula [1 ,2 ]
Kearnsc, John [3 ]
Costello, Benedict T. [4 ,5 ]
O'Brien, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Rudman, Murray [3 ]
Thompson, Mark C. [3 ]
Cloud, Geoffrey [6 ,7 ]
Stub, Dion [1 ,2 ]
Taylor, Andrew J. [1 ,2 ,4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Heart Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Baker Heart & Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Western Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Cent Clin Sch, Dept Neurosci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Alfred Hosp, Dept Neurol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Alfred Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
ESUS; Stroke; 4D flow CMR; Atrial myopathy/function; Cardiac magnetic resonance; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL RATIONALE; WAVE TERMINAL FORCE; TEMPORAL RELATIONSHIP; CRYPTOGENIC STROKE; FIBRILLATION; PREVENTION; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131215
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Left atrial myopathy has been implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Objective: To use advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging techniques, including left atrial (LA) strain and 4D flow CMR, to identify atrial myopathy in patients with ESUS. Methods: 20 patients with ESUS and no AF or other cause for stroke, and 20 age and sex-matched controls underwent CMR with 4D flow analysis. Markers of LA myopathy were assessed including LA size, volume, ejection fraction, and strain. 4D flow CMR was performed to measure novel markers of LA stasis such as LA velocities and the LA residence time distribution time constant (RTDtc). These markers of LA myopathy were compared be-tween the two groups.Results: There was no significant difference in: CMR-calculated LA velocities or LA total, passive or active ejection fractions between the groups. There was no significant difference in CMR-derived reservoir, conduit or con-tractile average longitudinal strain between the ESUS and control groups (22.9 vs 22.6%, p=0.379, 11.2 +/- 3.5 vs 12.4 +/- 2.6% p=0.224, 10.8 +/- 3.2 vs 10.4 +/- 2.3%, p=0.625 respectively). Similarly, RTDtc was not significantly longer in ESUS patients compared to controls (1.3 +/- 0.2 vs 1.2 +/- 0.2, p=0.1).Conclusions: There were no significant differences in any CMR marker of atrial myopathy in ESUS patients compared to healthy controls, likely reflecting the multiple possible aetiologies of ESUS suggesting that the role LA myopathy plays in ESUS is smaller than previously thought.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atrial Cardiopathy and Likely Pathogenic Patent Foramen Ovale in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
    Leventis, Ioannis A.
    Sagris, Dimitrios
    Strambo, Davide
    Perlepe, Kalliopi
    Sirimarco, Gaia
    Nannoni, Stefania
    Korompoki, Eleni
    Manios, Efstathios
    Makaritsis, Konstantinos
    Vemmos, Konstantinos
    Michel, Patrik
    Ntaios, George
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2021, 121 (03) : 361 - 365
  • [32] Advanced interatrial block: A predictor of covert atrial fibrillation in embolic stroke of undetermined source
    Mendieta, Guiomar
    Guasch, Eduard
    Weir, Danilo
    Aristizabal, David
    Alberto Escobar-Robledo, Luis
    Llull, Laura
    Mont, Lluis
    Bayes de Luna, Antonio
    Sitges, Marta
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2020, 58 : 113 - 118
  • [33] Prevalence and Prognostic Value of Atrial Cardiopathy in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
    Wu, Yueyang
    Yang, Xiaomeng
    Jing, Jing
    Meng, Xia
    Li, Zixiao
    Pan, Yuesong
    Jiang, Yong
    Yan, Hongyi
    Huang, Xinying
    Liu, Liping
    Zhao, Xingquan
    Wang, Yilong
    Li, Hao
    Wang, Yongjun
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 53 (05) : 556 - 563
  • [34] Is Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Shrinking?
    Tirschwell, David L.
    Taylor, Breana L.
    STROKE, 2019, 50 (09) : 2290 - 2291
  • [35] Embolic infarct topology differs between atrial fibrillation subtypes and embolic stroke of undetermined source
    Wolfe, Jared
    Oak, Solomon
    Tiongson, Justin
    Vigilante, Nicholas
    Frost, Emma
    Penckofer, Mary
    Thau, Lauren
    Iezzi, Zachary
    Patel, Pratit
    Siegler, James E.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 31 (11)
  • [36] Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Population with Left Atrial Dysfunction
    Meisel, Karl
    Yuan, Kristy
    Fang, Qizhi
    Bibby, Dwight
    Lee, Randall
    Schiller, Nelson B.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 28 (07) : 1891 - 1896
  • [37] Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
    Sposato, Luciano A.
    Sur, Nicole B.
    Katan, Mira
    Johansen, Michelle C.
    De Marchis, Gian Marco
    Caso, Valeria
    Fischer, Urs
    Chaturvedi, Seemant
    NEUROLOGY, 2024, 103 (01)
  • [38] Review and update of the concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Easton, J. Donald
    Hart, Robert G.
    Kasner, Scott
    Kamel, Hooman
    Ntaios, George
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2022, 18 (08) : 455 - 465
  • [39] Tailoring the Approach to Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source A Review
    Kamel, Hooman
    Merkler, Alexander E.
    Iadecola, Costantino
    Gupta, Ajay
    Navi, Babak B.
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2019, 76 (07) : 855 - 861
  • [40] Partitioning risk factors for embolic stroke of undetermined source using exploratory factor analysis
    Perkins, Jon D.
    Akhtar, Naveed
    Singh, Rajvir
    Kamran, Asad
    Ilyas, Saadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2022, 17 (04) : 407 - 414