Optimum Design of Pendulum Tuned Mass Dampers Considering Control Performance Degradation from Damper Connection

被引:7
作者
Wang, Wenxi [1 ]
Yu, Tianfu [2 ]
Yang, Zhilin [2 ]
Chen, Sheng [2 ]
Hua, Xugang [1 ]
Yang, Ou [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Shock & Vibrat Technol Res Ctr, Key Lab Bridge & Wind Engn Hunan Prov, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Key Lab Bridge & Wind Engn Hunan Prov, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Passive vibration control; Pendulum tuned mass damper (PTMD); Parametric detuning; Performance enhancement; STIFFNESS; MOTION; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12312
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Pendulum tuned mass dampers (PTMDs) are one of the most commonly used devices for high-rise structures to control large-amplitude vibrations due to dynamic excitations. In practice, the damper of PTMD usually connects the tuned mass to the location below the top floor rather than to the top floor, which is different from the case using a conventional tuned mass damper (TMD). Therefore, the classical optimal parametric formulas derived from the structure-conventional TMD model are not applicable to design the optimal parameters of PTMDs. In this paper, the simplified mechanical model of the structure-PTMD system is updated to consider the damper connection in practice. The fixed-points theory is employed to analytically derive the optimum design formulas for the PTMD by introducing the effect of modal shape. Moreover, the control effectiveness of the PTMD using the proposed method is studied. The control performance and robustness of the PTMD designed by the proposed method are compared to those designed by the classical optimum formulas under various dynamic loads. Finally, with the help of the performance degradation index (PDI), the control performance degradation of PTMD designed by classical formulas is quantified. The results show that the proposed optimal parameters have considerable differences from classical formulas. Through designing a PTMD on a multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) structure, the proposed optimum design is demonstrated to be more effective and robust than the classical formulas. To design a large mass ratio PTMD, the control performance degradation from the damper connection in practice is significant and should be seriously considered.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Chaudhary A. S., 2021, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1913, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1913/1/012003
[2]   Optimal tuned mass dampers for wind turbines using a Sigmoid satisfaction function-based multiobjective optimization during earthquakes [J].
Chen, Xin ;
Kareem, Ahsan ;
Xu, Guoji ;
Wang, Hao ;
Sun, Yong ;
Hu, Liang .
WIND ENERGY, 2021, 24 (10) :1140-1155
[3]   Improving the wind-induced human comfort of the Beijing Olympic Tower by a double-stage pendulum tuned mass damper [J].
Chen, Xin ;
Li, Aiqun ;
Zhang, Zhiqiang ;
Hu, Liang ;
Sun, Peng ;
Fan, Zhong ;
Liu, Xianming .
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2020, 29 (04)
[4]  
Chukka NDKR., 2019, Asian J Civ Eng, V20, P869, DOI [10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z, DOI 10.1007/S42107-019-00151-Z]
[5]  
Crandall S.H., 2014, Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems
[6]   Optimal design of tuned mass damper inerter with a Maxwell element for mitigating the vortex-induced vibration in bridges [J].
Dai, Jun ;
Xu, Zhao-Dong ;
Gai, Pan-Pan ;
Hu, Zhong-Wei .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 148
[7]   Tuned mass-damper-inerter control of wind-induced vibration of flexible structures based on inerter location [J].
Dai, Jun ;
Xu, Zhao-Dong ;
Gai, Pan-Pan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 199
[8]   Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD [J].
De Angelis, Maurizio ;
Perno, Salvatore ;
Reggio, Anna .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2012, 41 (01) :41-60
[9]  
Den Hartog J. P., 1956, Mechanical Vibrations, DOI DOI 10.1038/161503C0
[10]   A short note on equal peak design for the pendulum tuned mass dampers [J].
Deraemaeker, A. ;
Soltani, P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART K-JOURNAL OF MULTI-BODY DYNAMICS, 2017, 231 (01) :285-291