Is there a Kuznets curve for cropland use? The evidence from international panel data

被引:1
|
作者
Trofimov, Ivan D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington VUW, Dept Econ, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington VUW, Dept Econ, POB 600, Kelburn 6140, Wellington, New Zealand
关键词
agriculture; cropland; Kuznets curve; panel data; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; LAND-USE; GREEN-REVOLUTION; CARBON EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; CROSS-SECTION; INCOME; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1111/1477-8947.12328
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis assumes the nonlinear relationship between production and its environmental effects, suggesting that the negative effect of production on the natural environment is reversed at higher levels of development. In contrast to the majority of the studies, this paper considers the possibility of non-linear effects of per capita output on agricultural land use (cropland), as one of the natural resource stocks, and additionally examines the influence of demographic and productivity variables on the agricultural land use. The study draws on panel data from 143 economies over the 1990-2019 period and employs a series of panel econometrics techniques (including panel unit root and cointegration tests, panel ordinary least squares, generalized method of moments, and panel quantile models). The results unequivocally indicate the inverted U-shaped relationship between the GDP per capita and cropland use, as per EKC hypothesis. The results are robust with respect to employing different techniques, the identified turning points correspond to low and low-middle-income levels, and the effects of agricultural productivity and population density on land use are respectively negative and positive.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 256
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Beyond the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Africa: Evidence from Panel Cointegration
    Osabuohien, Evans S.
    Efobi, Uchenna R.
    Gitau, Ciliaka Millicent W.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2014, 16 (04) : 517 - 538
  • [22] Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from the ASEAN-5 countries with structural breaks
    Kisswani, Khalid M.
    Harraf, Arezou
    Kisswani, Amjad M.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (17) : 1855 - 1868
  • [23] The environmental Kuznets curve for PM2.5 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China: A spatial panel data approach
    Ding, Yueting
    Zhang, Ming
    Chen, Sai
    Wang, Wenwen
    Nie, Rui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 : 984 - 994
  • [24] The Energy Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Developed and Developing Economies
    Moosa, Imad A.
    Burns, Kelly
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (06) : 47 - 70
  • [25] Modeling the environmental Kuznets Curve: A stochastic approach using economic and climate data
    Naqvi, Rehana Ali
    Almohsen, Bandar
    Sohail, Ayesha
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 373
  • [26] Investigating the role of urban development in the conventional environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from the globe
    Katircioglu, Setareh
    Katircioglu, Salih
    Kilinc, Ceyhun C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (15) : 15029 - 15035
  • [27] Can financial inclusion be an effective mitigation measure? evidence from panel data analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve
    Renzhi, Nuobu
    Baek, Yong Jun
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 37
  • [28] Environmental pressure evaluation using carbondioxide emissions: An environmental Kuznets curve panel data application
    Tutulmaz, Onur
    Sahinoez, Ahmet
    Cagatay, Selim
    IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2012, 27 (314): : 35 - 72
  • [29] Is there a gender dimension of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from Asian countries
    Bilgili, Faik
    Khan, Masreka
    Awan, Ashar
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (03) : 2387 - 2418
  • [30] Is the environmental Kuznets curve related to the fishing footprint? Evidence from China
    Yilanci, Veli
    Cutcu, Ibrahim
    Cayir, Bilal
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2022, 254