Blended Learning in Principles of Marketing: The Effects of Student Differences on Student Performance

被引:5
作者
Cannon, Joseph P. [1 ]
Lohtia, Ritu [2 ]
Paulich, Brianna JeeWon [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
blended learning; self-efficacy; metacognition; effort; attitude; principles of marketing; SELF-EFFICACY; CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; MOTIVATION; IMPACT; METACOGNITION; TECHNOLOGY; CLASSROOM; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1177/02734753211058357
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Blended learning, which combines the benefits of both online learning and face-to-face instruction, is becoming popular in higher education. Despite its increase in application, there is limited research on the mechanisms to improve student performance in blended learning courses. This article aims to identify and empirically test individual factors influencing student performance in an introductory marketing course offered in a blended learning format. Through two surveys conducted during the semester at two large, public business schools, we find that metacognitive regulation, metacognitive knowledge, and student effort enhance student performance in blended learning courses. We also find that self-efficacy and course-specific attitudes affect metacognition and student effort. Based on the results, we provide practical strategies to design blended learning courses that improve student performance.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 90
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
Acer for Education, 2020, COV 19 WILL BLEND LE
[2]   Effect of Type of Curriculum on Educational Outcomes and Motivation Among Marketing Students With Different Learning Styles [J].
Ackerman, David S. ;
Hu, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING EDUCATION, 2011, 33 (03) :273-284
[3]   A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology [J].
Adams, Alison E. M. ;
Randall, Shelby ;
Traustadottir, Tinna .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2015, 14 (01)
[4]  
Adams G.S., 1964, Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Psychology, and Guidance
[5]  
Adams L., 2015, MICRO MOMENTS YOUR G
[6]  
Allen I. E., 2007, Blending in the extent and promise of blended education in the United States
[7]  
Anderson, 2018, 5 ELEMENTS EFFORT
[8]   What Might Online Delivery Teach Us About Blended Management Education? Prior Perspectives and Future Directions [J].
Arbaugh, J. B. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2014, 38 (06) :784-817
[9]  
Ariyati, 2018, ADV SOCIAL SCI ED HU, V139, P67
[10]  
Artino A.R., 2007, INT J INSTRUCTIONAL, V4, P3