CO2 emission hotspots analysis on supply chains for wooden houses in Japan

被引:5
作者
Imada, Seiya [1 ]
Maeno, Keitaro [1 ]
Kagawa, Shigemi [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Econ, 744 Motooka,Nishi Ku, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Econ, 744 Motooka,Nishi Ku, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
关键词
CARBON EMISSIONS; CONSTRUCTION SECTOR; EMBODIED ENERGY; BUILDINGS; CLUSTERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120151
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ninety-four percent of CO2 emissions induced by final demand in the global construction sector stem from the supply chain. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the CO2 emission hotspots within the supply chain and implement targeted reduction measures. This study proposed a supply chain clustering approach considering the functional unit of houses and identified CO2 emission hotspots within the supply chain structure of wooden houses, which accounted for approximately 90% of the total housing stock in Japan. We founded that the top ten CO2 emission clusters (i.e., emission hotspots) account for approximately 40% of the carbon footprint (38 t-CO2) of a wooden house. Specifically, the iron and steel cluster, which includes the pig iron and crude steel sectors, and the cement cluster, comprising the cement and ready -mixed concrete sectors, collectively contribute to approximately 75% of the CO2 emissions within the top 10 clusters. Therefore, the reduction of CO2 emissions from these clusters is of paramount importance. Decision-makers should promote renovation and remodeling policies for vacant houses and prioritize the reuse of foundations, predominantly constructed using steel and cement products, to reduce the supply-chain emissions from wooden houses.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Cities as carbon sinks-classification of wooden buildings
    Amiri, Ali
    Ottelin, Juudit
    Sorvari, Jaana
    Junnila, Seppo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [2] Comparative life cycle assessment of cross laminated timber building and concrete building with special focus on biogenic carbon
    Andersen, Julie Hansted
    Rasmussen, Nana Lin
    Ryberg, Morten Walbech
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 254
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of the building industry: An overview of two decades of research (1995-2018)
    Bahramian, Majid
    Yetilmezsoy, Kaan
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 219
  • [4] Structural path and sensitivity analysis of the CO2 emissions in the construction industry
    Chen, Jindao
    Shi, Qian
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 92
  • [5] Buildings as a global carbon sink
    Churkina, Galina
    Organschi, Alan
    Reyer, Christopher P. O.
    Ruff, Andrew
    Vinke, Kira
    Liu, Zhu
    Reck, Barbara K.
    Graedel, T. E.
    Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (04) : 269 - +
  • [6] System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition
    Dixit, Manish K.
    Culp, Charles H.
    Fernandez-Solis, Jose L.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 : 153 - 164
  • [7] European Commission, 2021, Impact assessment report
  • [8] From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB)
    Hernandez, Patxi
    Kenny, Paul
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) : 815 - 821
  • [9] Life-cycle energy analysis of prefabricated building components: an input-output-based hybrid model
    Hong, Jingke
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Mao, Chao
    Li, Zhengdao
    Li, Kaijian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2198 - 2207
  • [10] Strategies for enhancing the accuracy of evaluation and sustainability performance of building
    Hossain, Md Uzzal
    Ng, S. Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 261 (261)