The value of collision feedback in robotic surgical skills training

被引:1
作者
Postema, Roelf [1 ,2 ]
Hardon, Hidde [1 ,3 ]
Rahimi, A. Masie [1 ,4 ]
Horeman, Roel [2 ]
Nickel, Felix [5 ]
Dankelman, Jenny [2 ,6 ]
Bloemendaal, Alexander L. A. [7 ]
van der Elst, Maarten [6 ,7 ]
van der Peet, Donald L. [1 ]
Daams, Freek [1 ]
Hardon, Sem F. [1 ,2 ]
Horeman, Tim [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept BioMech Engn, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Skills Ctr Hlth Sci ASC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn 3mE, Delft, Netherlands
[7] Reinier Graaf Gasthuis, Dept Surg, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Robotic surgery; Simulation training; Haptic feedback; Visual feedback; Skills acquisition; Patient safety; VISUAL FORCE FEEDBACK; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; VIRTUAL-REALITY; HAPTIC FEEDBACK; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; RIGHT COLECTOMY; CANCER; PSYCHOMOTOR; SIMULATORS; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1007/s10055-023-00891-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Collision feedback about instrument and environment interaction is often lacking in robotic surgery training devices. The PoLaRS virtual reality simulator is a newly developed desk trainer that overcomes drawbacks of existing robot trainers for advanced laparoscopy. This study aimed to assess the effect of haptic and visual feedback during training on the performance of a robotic surgical task. Robotic surgery-naive participants were randomized and equally divided into two training groups: Haptic and Visual Feedback (HVF) and No Haptic and Visual Feedback. Participants performed two basic virtual reality training tasks on the PoLaRS system as a pre- and post-test. The measurement parameters Time, Tip-to-tip distance, Path length Left/Right and Collisions Left/Right were used to analyze the learning curves and statistically compare the pre- and post-tests performances. In total, 198 trials performed by 22 participants were included. The visual and haptic feedback did not negatively influence the time to complete the tasks. Although no improvement in skill was observed between pre- and post-tests, the mean rank of the number of collisions of the right grasper (dominant hand) was significantly lower in the HVF feedback group during the second post-test (Mean Rank = 8.73 versus Mean Rank = 14.27, U = 30.00, p = 0.045). Haptic and visual feedback during the training on the PoLaRS system resulted in fewer instrument collisions. These results warrant the introduction of haptic feedback in subjects with no experience in robotic surgery. The PoLaRS system can be utilized to remotely optimize instrument handling before commencing robotic surgery in the operating room.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators a systematic review [J].
Abboudi, Hamid ;
Khan, Mohammed S. ;
Aboumarzouk, Omar ;
Guru, Khurshid A. ;
Challacombe, Ben ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Ahmed, Kamran .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (02) :194-205
[2]   Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review & meta-analysis [J].
Alaker, Medhat ;
Wynn, Greg R. ;
Arulampalam, Tan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 29 :85-94
[3]   The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers [J].
Alleblas, Chantal C. J. ;
Vleugels, Michel P. H. ;
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. ;
Nieboer, Theodoor E. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (12) :5411-5417
[4]   Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature [J].
Amirabdollahian F. ;
Livatino S. ;
Vahedi B. ;
Gudipati R. ;
Sheen P. ;
Gawrie-Mohan S. ;
Vasdev N. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (1) :11-25
[5]   Training in Robotic Surgery Simulators, Surgery, and Credentialing [J].
Bahler, Clinton D. ;
Sundaram, Chandru P. .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (04) :581-+
[6]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study [J].
Baik, Seung Hyuk ;
Kwon, Hye Youn ;
Kim, Jin Soo ;
Hur, Hyuk ;
Sohn, Seung Kook ;
Cho, Chang Hwan ;
Kim, Hoguen .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) :1480-1487
[7]   Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum [J].
Bric, Justin ;
Connolly, Michael ;
Kastenmeier, Andrew ;
Goldblatt, Matthew ;
Gould, Jon C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (12) :3343-3348
[8]   Does rating with a checklist improve the effect of E-learning for cognitive and practical skills in bariatric surgery? A rater-blinded, randomized-controlled trial [J].
De La Garza, Javier R. ;
Schmidt, Mona W. ;
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich ;
Benner, Laura ;
Mueller, Philip C. ;
Kenngott, Hannes G. ;
Fischer, Lars ;
Mueller-Stich, Beat P. ;
Nickel, Felix .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05) :1532-1543
[9]   Robotic surgery [J].
Diana, M. ;
Marescaux, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (02) :E15-E28
[10]   Performance and perception of haptic feedback in a laparoscopic 3D virtual reality simulator [J].
Hagelsteen, Kristine ;
Johansson, Richard ;
Ekelund, Mikael ;
Bergenfelz, Anders ;
Anderberg, Magnus .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 28 (05) :309-316