Cost Comparison: Evaluating Transfemoral and Transradial Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography

Background Modern medicine necessitates the delivery of increasingly complex health care while minimizing cost. Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures is becoming more common as accumulating data demonstrate fewer complications, improved patient satisfaction, and high rates of treatment success compared with the transfemoral access (TFA) approach; however, disparities in cost between these approaches remain unclear. We compared supply and equipment costs between TRA and TFA for diagnostic cerebral angiography and evaluate the specific items that account for these differences.Methods We reviewed all adult patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography from July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Data related to patient demographics, vascular access site, catheters used, cost of catheters, arterial access sheath use, cost of sheaths, closure devices used, and cost of closure devices were collected.Results The transradial approach resulted in higher price of radial access sheath; however, the overall cost of closure devices was much lower in TRA group than in the TFA cohort. There was no significant difference in the cost of catheters. Overall, the total supply costs for TRA cerebral angiography were significantly lower than those of TFA cerebral angiography. The relative materials cost difference of using TRA was 20.9%.Conclusion This study is the first itemized materials cost analysis of TRA versus TFA cerebral angiography. TRA necessitates the use of a more expensive access sheath device; however, this cost is offset by the increased cost of devices used for femoral arteriotomy closure. Overall, the supply and equipment costs were significantly lower for TRA than TFA.