Theorizing Digital Platforms: A Conceptual Framework for the Gig Economy

被引:0
作者
Shevchuk, Andrey [1 ]
机构
[1] HSE Univ, Dept Sociol, Lab Studies Econ Sociol, 11 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
来源
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY-EKONOMICHESKAYA SOTSIOLOGIYA | 2023年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
sociology of markets; digital platforms; platform economy; gig economy; platform work; market infrastructure; institutional entrepreneurship; labor market regulation; BUSINESS MODEL; EMPLOYMENT; POLITICS; ORGANIZATION; WORKERS; ONLINE; RISE;
D O I
10.17323/1726-3247-2023-5-11-53
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Contemporary sociology of work pays increasing attention to the study of the work experiences of individuals engaged in digital labour platforms. However, for a deeper understanding of the gig economy, this approach needs to be complemented by an analysis of the digital platforms as organizational structures and social actors. This article proposes a conceptual framework for such analysis, drawing on theoretical insights from economic sociology, institutionalism, and political economy. The role of digital platforms is problematized through the five key categories (organizational innovation, mediator, market infrastructure, private regulator, institutional entrepreneur), which are systematically integrated into the analysis. Digital platforms represent a radical organizational innovation built on technologies capable of effectively coordinating the activities of dispersed agents without requiring their spatial, temporal, or organizational co-presence. This facilitates the growth of businesses benefiting from the mediation of external workers and resources. The communication means facilitated by platforms gradually transform into systemic infrastructure, shaping the fundamental conditions for market functioning. With the ability to unilaterally es-tablish "rules of the game" and exercise algorithmic control, platforms evolve into private market regulators, competing with the state. To strengthen and legitimize their power, platforms actively engage in the political process with the aim of social market reorganization and overall institutional restructuring. At this stage, the conceptual framework loops back to the idea that platforms represent an innovation, the diffusion of which must address the most acute social contradictions related to the role of platforms as mediators, infrastructures, private regulators, and institutional entrepreneurs. The article demonstrates how the proposed categories can be applied to the analysis of various gig economy issues.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 53
页数:194
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Bibliometric Analysis of Gig Economy [J].
Batmunkh, Altanshagai ;
Fekete-Farkas, Maria ;
Lakner, Zoltan .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (02)
[42]   Antagonism beyond employment: how the 'subordinated agency' of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy [J].
Wood, Alex J. ;
Lehdonvirta, Vili .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 19 (04) :1369-1396
[43]   A Gig mHealth Economy Framework: Scoping Review of Internet Publications [J].
Alanezi, Fahad ;
Alanzi, Turki .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (01)
[44]   Prospects of Impending Digital Platform Economy: Rise of Gig Work [J].
Tripathi, Mano Ashish ;
Tripathi, Ravindra ;
Yadav, Uma Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (03) :4879-4887
[45]   Sceptics or supporters? Consumers' views of work in the gig economy [J].
Healy, Joshua ;
Pekarek, Andreas ;
Vromen, Ariadne .
NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT, 2020, 35 (01) :1-19
[46]   Examining technostress and its impact on worker well-being in the digital gig economy [J].
Umair, Azka ;
Conboy, Kieran ;
Whelan, Eoin .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (07) :206-242
[47]   Technologically mediated human resource management in the gig economy [J].
McDonnell, Anthony ;
Carbery, Ronan ;
Burgess, John ;
Sherman, Ultan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 32 (19) :3995-4015
[48]   Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in the Gig Economy: Revolutionizing the Digital Transformation [J].
Behl, Aastha ;
Rajagopal, K. ;
Sheorey, Pratima .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEM MODELING AND DESIGN, 2021, 12 (04)
[49]   Typology of digital platforms in shared economy [J].
Popov, Evgeny V. ;
Veretennikova, Anna Yu. .
TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2022, 20 (04) :45-58
[50]   Digital technologies, gig work and labour share [J].
Henley, Andrew .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 46 (06) :1407-1429