A prospective intervention study to identify drug-related emergency department visits comparing a standard care group and a pharmaceutical care group

被引:2
作者
Hellinger, Benjamin J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gries, Andre [1 ]
Schiek, Susanne [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Remane, Yvonne [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bertsche, Thilo [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Surveillance Ward, Emergency Dept, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Pharm Dept, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Drug Safety Ctr, ZAMS, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Leipzig Univ Hosp, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Leipzig, Inst Pharm, Med Fac, Clin Pharm, Bruederstr 32, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
adverse drug reaction; clinical pharmacy services; emergency department; non-specific-complaints; polypharmacy; EVENTS; PHARMACIST; CONSEQUENCES; ADMISSION;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001070
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and importanceAdverse drug reactions impose a major burden. Those adverse drug reactions might lead to hospitalization but are often not correctly identified in the emergency department (ED). Clinical pharmacists, although not routinely implemented, can help identify adverse drug reactions.ObjectiveThe primary objective was to examine the drug association of ED visits in a pharmaceutical group with a clinical pharmacist integrated in the ED team compared with a standard group without additional support.Design/setting/participantsThis prospective intervention study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital in Leipzig, Germany. Patients who were >= 50 years old were included. From 1 March 2020 to May 31, 2020 patients were enrolled in the standard group. From 1 March 2021 to 31 May 2021, the pharmaceutical group was enrolled. The clinical pharmacist supported the ED team with patient ' s detailed medication history and medication analysis. In both groups, patients were evaluated whether their ED visit was drug-related.Outcome measures and analysisThe number of identified drug-related ED presentations were compared between the two groups. Interventions performed on adverse drug reaction management, causative drugs and patient characteristics were evaluated.Main resultsA total of 798 patients were enrolled in the standard group and 827 patients in the pharmaceutical group. Patients whose ED visit was drug-related had a median age of 77 years [(Q25-Q75) 63.5-83.5] and took 7 [(Q25-Q75) 5-8] drugs in standard group. In the pharmaceutical group median age was 78 years [(Q25-Q75) 66-83] and number of drugs taken was 9 [(Q25-Q75) 5.25-11]. 31 (3.9%) drug-related ED visits were identified in the standard group compared to 104 (12.6%) in the pharmaceutical group (OR 3.56; 95% CI 2.35-5.38). An intervention on the patient's pharmacotherapy was performed in 16 drug-related ED visits in standard group compared to 77 in the pharmaceutical group.ConclusionIn this study the implementation of a clinical pharmacist was associated with improved identification of drug-related ED visits. Discontinuations of causal medications and dose reductions were significantly higher in the pharmaceutical group compared to the standard care group.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 17
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Clinical relevance of pharmacist intervention in an emergency department [J].
Antonia Perez-Moreno, Maria ;
Manuel Rodriguez-Camacho, Juan ;
Calderon-Hernanz, Beatriz ;
Comas-Diaz, Bernardino ;
Tarradas-Torras, Jordi .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (08) :495-501
[2]   Prevention of adverse drug reactions in intensive care patients by personal intervention based on an electronic clinical decision support system [J].
Bertsche, Thilo ;
Pfaff, Johannes ;
Schiller, Petra ;
Kaltschmidt, Jens ;
Pruszydlo, Markus G. ;
Stremmel, Wolfgang ;
Walter-Sack, Ingeborg ;
Haefeli, Walter E. ;
Encke, Jens .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (04) :665-672
[3]   Drug-related falls in older patients: implicated drugs, consequences, and possible prevention strategies [J].
de Jong, Marlies R. ;
Van der Elst, Maarten ;
Hartholt, Klaas A. .
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 4 (04) :147-154
[4]   Promoting clinical pharmacy services through advanced medication review in the emergency department [J].
de Lorenzo-Pinto, Ana ;
Garcia-Sanchez, Raquel ;
Herranz, Ana ;
Miguens, Iria ;
Sanjurjo-Saez, Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2020, 27 (02) :73-77
[5]   Pharmacist- versus physician-acquired medication history: a prospective study at the emergency department [J].
De Winter, Sabrina ;
Spriet, Isabel ;
Indevuyst, Christophe ;
Vanbrabant, Peter ;
Desruelles, Didier ;
Sabbe, Marc ;
Gillet, Jean Bernard ;
Wilmer, Alexander ;
Willems, Ludo .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (05) :371-375
[6]   Lack of awareness of community-acquired adverse drug reactions upon hospital admission - Dimensions and consequences of a dilemma [J].
Dormann, H ;
Criegee-Rieck, M ;
Neubert, A ;
Egger, T ;
Geise, A ;
Krebs, S ;
Schneider, TH ;
Levy, M ;
Hahn, EG ;
Brune, K .
DRUG SAFETY, 2003, 26 (05) :353-362
[7]   Integration of a clinical pharmacist into a Canadian, urban emergency department: a prospective observational study [J].
Dryden, Lindsay ;
Dewhurst, Norman F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 27 (02) :175-179
[8]  
Fasipe OJ., 2019, Toxicol Res Appl, V3, p239784731985045
[9]  
Gross Kylee, 2021, Sr Care Pharm, V36, P217, DOI 10.4140/TCP.n.2021.217
[10]   Emergency physician recognition of adverse drug-related events in elder patients presenting to an emergency department [J].
Hohl, CM ;
Robitaille, C ;
Lord, V ;
Dankoff, J ;
Colacone, A ;
Pham, L ;
Bérard, A ;
Pépin, J ;
Afilalo, M .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (03) :197-205