The Brazilian national prospective active surveillance (AS) cohort of patients with low-risk prostate cancer in the public health system: vigiaSUS study protocol

被引:0
作者
Basso, Jeziel [1 ]
de Lima, Juliana Beust [3 ]
Bessel, Marina [3 ]
Tobar Leitao, Santiago Alonso [3 ]
Machado Baptista, Thais [3 ]
Roithmann, Sergio [1 ]
Franco Carvalhal, Eduardo [2 ]
da Silva Schmitt, Caio [2 ]
Morzoletto Pedrollo, Ivan [4 ]
Schuch, Alice [4 ]
Atalibio Hartmann, Antonio [5 ]
Neubarth Estivallet, Carmen Liane [5 ]
Behrend Silva Ribeiro, Guilherme [2 ]
Zordan, Ricardo Andre [2 ]
Isaacsson Velho, Pedro [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Oncol Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Urol Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Project Off, PROADI SUS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Radiol Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[5] Hosp Moinhos Vento, Pathol Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[6] Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Oncol Dept, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Active surveillance; Prostate cancer; Prospective cohort; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TERM OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; MEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01380-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Prostate cancer exhibits a very diverse behaviour, with some patients dying from the disease and others never needing treatment. Active surveillance (AS) consists of periodic PSA assessment (prostate-specific antigen), DRE (digital rectal examination) and periodic prostate biopsies. According to the main guidelines, AS is the preferred strategy for low-risk patients, to avoid or delay definitive treatment. However, concerns remain regarding its applicability in certain patient subgroups, such as African American men, who were underrepresented in the main cohorts. Brazil has a very racially diverse population, with 56.1% self-reporting as brown or black. The aim of this study is to evaluate and validate the AS strategy in low-risk prostate cancer patients following an AS protocol in the Brazilian public health system.Methods This is a multicentre AS prospective cohort study that will include 200 patients from all regions of Brazil in the public health system. Patients with prostate adenocarcinoma and low-risk criteria, defined as clinical staging T1-T2a, Gleason score <= 6, and PSA < 10 ng/ml, will be enrolled. Archival prostate cancer tissue will be centrally reviewed. Patients enrolled in the study will follow the AS strategy, which involves PSA and physical examination every 6 months as well as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) every two years and prostate biopsy at month 12 and then every two years. The primary objective is to evaluate the reclassification rate at 12 months, and secondary objectives include determining the treatment-free survival rate, metastasis-free survival, and specific and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include the evaluation of quality of life and anxiety, the impact of PTEN loss and the economic impact of AS on the Brazilian public health system.Discussion This is the first Brazilian prospective study of patients with low-risk prostate cancer under AS. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest AS study cohort with a majority of nonwhite patients. We believe that this study is an opportunity to better understand the outcomes of AS in populations underrepresented in studies. Based on these data, an AS national clinical guideline will be developed, which may have a beneficial impact on the quality of life of patients and on public health.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Brookland, Robert K.
    Meyer, Laura
    Gress, Donna M.
    Byrd, David R.
    Winchester, David P.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [2] A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Pickles, Tom
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 954 - 960
  • [3] The Value of Mandatory Second Opinion Pathology Review of Prostate Needle Biopsy Interpretation Before Radical Prostatectomy
    Brimo, Fadi
    Schultz, Luciana
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [4] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [5] Disparities at Presentation, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival in African American Men, Affected by Prostate Cancer
    Chornokur, Ganna
    Dalton, Kyle
    Borysova, Meghan E.
    Kumar, Nagi B.
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2011, 71 (09) : 985 - 997
  • [6] The economics of active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) : 278 - 282
  • [7] Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Goteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
    Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud
    Holmberg, Erik
    Khatami, Ali
    Pihl, Carl-Gustaf
    Stranne, Johan
    Hugosson, Jonas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (05) : 760 - 766
  • [8] 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hamdy, F. C.
    Donovan, J. L.
    Lane, J. A.
    Mason, M.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Holding, P.
    Davis, M.
    Peters, T. J.
    Turner, E. L.
    Martin, R. M.
    Oxley, J.
    Robinson, M.
    Staffurth, J.
    Walsh, E.
    Bollina, P.
    Catto, J.
    Doble, A.
    Doherty, A.
    Gillatt, D.
    Kockelbergh, R.
    Kynaston, H.
    Paul, A.
    Powell, P.
    Prescott, S.
    Rosario, D. J.
    Rowe, E.
    Neal, D. E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) : 1415 - 1424
  • [9] IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica), 2021, Title of subordinate document: Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicilios Continua (PNAD) Caracteristicas gerais dos moradores 2020-2021. Diretoria de Pesquisas, Coordenacao de Pesquisas por Amostra de Domicilios
  • [10] Instituto Nacional de Cancer (INCA), 2020, Title of subordinate document in: Estimativa 2020: incidencia de cancer no Brasil