Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:3
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Beginning of clinical treatment using the 1.5 Tesla MR-Linac system in Japan: a narrative review
    Takahashi, Noriyoshi
    Tanaka, Shohei
    Umezawa, Rei
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Suzuki, Yu
    Kishida, Keita
    Omata, So
    Arai, Kazuhiro
    Katsuta, Yoshiyuki
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Jingu, Keiichi
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (02) : 1131 - 1138
  • [42] Feasibility of stereotactic radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR-linac: Multi-fraction treatment of pelvic lymph node oligometastases
    Werensteijn-Honingh, Anita M.
    Kroon, Petra S.
    Winkel, Dennis
    Aalbers, Ellart M.
    van Asselen, Bram
    Bol, Gijsbert H.
    Brown, Kevin J.
    Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
    van Es, Corine A.
    Glitzner, Markus
    de Groot-van Breugel, Eline N.
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Intven, Martijn
    Kok, Jan G. M.
    Kontaxis, Charis
    Kotte, Alexis N.
    Lagendijk, Jan J. W.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Wolthaus, Jochem W. H.
    Woodings, Simon J.
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 134 : 50 - 54
  • [43] Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer; feasibility of the workflow on a 1.5T MR-linac: clinical implementation and initial experience
    Intven, M. P. W.
    van Otterloo, S. R. de Mol
    Mook, S.
    Doornaert, P. A. H.
    de Groot-van Breugel, E. N.
    Sikkes, G. G.
    Willemsen-Bosman, M. E.
    van Zijp, H. M.
    Tijssen, R. H. N.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : 172 - 178
  • [44] Minimizing the magnetic field effect in MR-linac specific QA-tests: the use of electron dense materials
    van Zijp, H. M.
    van Asselen, B.
    Wolthaus, J. W. H.
    Kok, J. M. G.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    Ishakoglu, K.
    Beld, E.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03) : N50 - N59
  • [45] The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac
    Onal, Cem
    Efe, Esma
    Bozca, Recep
    Yavas, Cagdas
    Yavas, Guler
    Arslan, Gungor
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [46] Early experience with MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR-Linac: First 6 months of operation using adapt to shape workflow
    de Leon, Jeremiah
    Crawford, David
    Moutrie, Zoe
    Alvares, Stacy
    Hogan, Louise
    Pagulayan, Claire
    Jelen, Urszula
    Loo, Conrad
    Aylward, Jack D.
    Condon, Kieran
    Dunkerley, Nicolle
    Heinke, Monique Y.
    Sampaio, Sandy
    Simon, Kathy
    Twentyman, Tania
    Jameson, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 66 (01) : 138 - 145
  • [47] Initial clinical experience of patient-specific QA of treatment delivery in online adaptive radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Yang, B.
    Wong, Y. S.
    Lam, W. W.
    Geng, H.
    Huang, C. Y.
    Tang, K. K.
    Law, W. K.
    Ho, C. C.
    Nam, P. H.
    Cheung, K. Y.
    Yu, S. K.
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (03)
  • [48] Extension and validation of a GPU-Monte Carlo dose engine gDPM for 1.5 T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification
    Li, Yongbao
    Ding, Shouliang
    Wang, Bin
    Liu, Hongdong
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    Song, Ting
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) : 6174 - 6183
  • [49] Dosimetric evaluation of irradiation geometry and potential air gaps in an acrylic miniphantom used for external audit of absolute dose calibration for a hybrid 1.5 T MR-linac system
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Subashi, Ergys
    Michael Lovelock, Dale
    Kry, Stephen
    Alvarez, Paola Elisa
    Hunt, Margie A.
    Lim, Seng Boh
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [50] Joint radial trajectory correction for accelerated T2 mapping on an MR-Linac
    Bano, Wajiha
    Holmes, Will
    Goodburn, Rosie
    Golbabaee, Mohammad
    Gupta, Amit
    Withey, Sam
    Tree, Alison
    Oelfke, Uwe
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (11) : 7027 - 7038