Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:3
|
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of an MR-compatible motion platform for quality assurance of motion-compensated treatments on the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Oolbekkink, Stijn
    Borman, Pim T. S.
    Wolthaus, Jochem W. H.
    van Asselen, Bram
    van Lier, Astrid L. H. M. W.
    Dunn, Stephanie
    Koenig, Grant R.
    Hartman, Nick
    Kheirkhah, Niusha
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Fast, Martin F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025,
  • [32] An improved calibration procedure for accurate plastic scintillation dosimetry on an MR-linac
    van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon
    Lessard, Boby
    Cote, Benjamin
    Hackett, Sara L.
    Mugnes, Jean-Michel
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    de Vries, Laurie J. M.
    Archambault, Louis
    Bosma, Tom
    van Asselen, Bram
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Fast, Martin F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (24)
  • [33] Technical note: Characterization of a multi-point scintillation dosimetry research platform for a low-field MR-Linac
    Crosby, Jennie
    Ruff, Chase
    Gregg, Ken
    Turcotte, Jonathan
    Glide-Hurst, Carri
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 6475 - 6484
  • [34] Adaptive SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac for prostate cancer: On the accuracy of dose delivery in view of the prolonged session time
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Rigo, Michele
    Naccarato, Stefania
    Gurrera, Davide
    Figlia, Vanessa
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Nicosia, Luca
    Giaj-Levra, Niccolo
    Cuccia, Francesco
    Vitale, Claudio
    Stavreva, Nadejda
    Pressyanov, Dobromir S.
    Stavrev, Pavel
    Pellegrini, Roberto
    Alongi, Filippo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 80 : 34 - 41
  • [35] MRI-guided cardiac radiotherapy using the 1.5T MR-linac: surveying emerging patterns of care
    Akdag, Osman
    Mandija, Stefano
    Pomp, Jacquelien
    Chen, Xinru
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Oh, Seungjong
    Trombetta, Mark
    Tan, Hendrick
    De Leon, Jeremy
    Jameson, Michael
    Efe, Esma
    Onal, Cem
    Fast, Martin F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2936 - S2940
  • [36] Influence of different factors on registration error in a 1.5 T MR-guided linac
    Yin, Peijun
    Yu, Gang
    Hou, Chuanke
    Liu, Xuechun
    Sun, Mengdi
    Li, Kuo
    Cui, Zhen
    Liu, Pei
    Shi, Xihua
    Zhang, Qiang
    Chen, Yukai
    Pi, Bingjie
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Zhenjiang
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (10)
  • [37] Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR-Linac system
    Behzadipour, Mojtaba
    Palta, Jatinder
    Ma, Tianjun
    Yuan, Lulin
    Kim, Siyong
    Kirby, Suzanne
    Torkelson, Laurel
    Baker, James
    Koenig, Tammy
    Khalifa, Mateb Al
    Hawranko, Robert
    Richeson, Dylan
    Fields, Emma
    Weiss, Elisabeth
    Song, William Y.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (08):
  • [38] MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning
    Michel Chea
    Mathilde Croisé
    Christelle Huet
    Céline Bassinet
    Mohamed-Amine Benadjaoud
    Catherine Jenny
    Radiation Oncology, 19
  • [39] Real-time 4D MRI using MR signature matching (MRSIGMA) on a 1.5T MR-Linac system
    Wu, Can
    Murray, Victor
    Siddiq, Syed S.
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Reyngold, Marsha
    Crane, Christopher
    Otazo, Ricardo
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (18)
  • [40] Characterization of a prototype MR-compatible Delta4 QA system in a 1.5 tesla MR-linac
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    Seravalli, E.
    Houweling, A. C.
    Woodings, S. J.
    van Rooij, R.
    Wolthaus, J. W. H.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (02)