Influence of magnetic field on a novel scintillation dosimeter in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:3
|
作者
Oolbekkink, Stijn [1 ,3 ]
van Asselen, Bram [1 ]
Woodings, Simon J. [1 ]
Wolthaus, Jochem W. H. [1 ]
de Vries, J. H. Wilfred [1 ]
van Appeldoorn, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Feijoo, Marcos [2 ]
van den Dobbelsteen, Madelon [1 ]
Raaymakers, Bas W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Blue Phys, Lutz, FL USA
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Heidelberglaan 100, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
MRI-linac; radiotherapy; scintillation dosimetry; time-resolved dosimetry; RELATIVE DOSIMETRY; IONIZATION-CHAMBER; RADIOTHERAPY; DETECTORS; AIR; MV;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14180
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For commissioning and quality assurance for adaptive workflows on the MR-linac, a dosimeter which can measure time-resolved dose during MR image acquisition is desired. The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation dosimeter is potentially an ideal detector for such measurements. However, some detectors can be influenced by the magnetic field of the MR-linac. To assess the calibration methods and magnetic field dependency of the Blue Physics scintillator in the 1.5 T MR-linac. Several calibration methods were assessed for robustness. Detector characteristics and the influence of the calibration methods were assessed based on dose reproducibility, dose linearity, dose rate dependency, relative output factor (ROF), percentage depth dose profile, axial rotation and the radial detector orientation with respect to the magnetic field. The potential application of time-resolved dynamic dose measurements during MRI acquisition was assessed. A variation of calibration factors was observed for different calibration methods. Dose reproducibility, dose linearity and dose rate stability were all found to be within tolerance and were not significantly affected by different calibration methods. Measurements with the detector showed good correspondence with reference chambers. The ROF and radial orientation dependence measurements were influenced by the calibration method used. Axial detector dependence was assessed and relative readout differences of up to 2.5% were observed. A maximum readout difference of 10.8% was obtained when rotating the detector with respect to the magnetic field. Importantly, measurements with and without MR image acquisition were consistent for both static and dynamic situations. The Blue Physics scintillation detector is suitable for relative dosimetry in the 1.5 T MR-linac when measurements are within or close to calibration conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MRI commissioning of 1.5T MR-linac systems - a multi-institutional study
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    Glitzner, Markus
    Chugh, Brige
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    Dubec, Michael
    Wang, Jihong
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 114 - 120
  • [22] Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Barnes, Helen
    Alexander, Sophie
    Bower, Lorna
    Ehlers, Jakob
    Gani, Cihan
    Herbert, Trina
    Lawes, Rebekah
    Moller, Pia Krause
    Morgan, Toby
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    Smith, Gillian
    van Triest, Baukelien
    Tyagi, Neelam
    Whiteside, Lee
    McNair, Helen
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 : 31 - 37
  • [23] The impact of margin reduction on dose distribution of prostate radiotherapy with 1.5-T MR-Linac
    Elmali, Aysenur
    Efe, Esma
    Yavas, Cagdas
    Arslan, Gungor
    Yavas, Guler
    Onal, Cem
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2316 - S2318
  • [24] Feasibility of using a dual isocentre technique for treating cervical cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Chuter, Robert W.
    Brewster, Frank
    Retout, Louise
    Cree, Anthea
    Akturk, Nesrin
    Hales, Rosie
    Benson, Rebecca
    Hoskin, Peter
    McWilliam, Alan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (02)
  • [25] Longitudinal assessment of quality assurance measurements in a 1.5T MR-linac: Part I-Linear accelerator
    Subashi, Ergys
    Lim, Seng Boh
    Gonzalez, Xesus
    Tyagi, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (10): : 190 - 201
  • [26] Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac
    Winkel, Dennis
    Werensteijn-Honingh, Anita M.
    Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
    Intven, Martijn P. W.
    Hes, Jochem
    Snoeren, Louk M. W.
    Visser, Sanne A.
    Bol, Gijsbert H.
    Raaymakers, Bas W.
    Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M.
    Kroon, Petra S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 154 : 243 - 248
  • [27] Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac
    Price, Alex T.
    Knutson, Nels C.
    Kim, Taeho
    Green, Olga L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (03):
  • [28] Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    St-Aubin, Joel
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Dunkerley, David A. P.
    Graves, Stephen A.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 160 - 172
  • [29] Stability of MRI contrast agents in high-energy radiation of a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Wang, Jihong
    Salzillo, Travis
    Jiang, Yongying
    Mackeyev, Yuri
    Fuller, Clifton David
    Chung, Caroline
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Hughes, Neil
    Ding, Yao
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Vedam, Sastry
    Krishnan, Sunil
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : 55 - 64
  • [30] Low-density gel dosimeter for measurement of the electron return effect in an MR-linac
    McDonald, Brigid A.
    Lee, Hannah J.
    Ibbott, Geoffrey S.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (20)