共 50 条
Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus DNAemia after end of regular prophylaxis after heart transplantation
被引:0
|作者:
Immohr, Moritz Benjamin
[1
,2
,3
]
Oehler, Daniel
[2
,4
]
Jenkins, Freya Sophie
[1
,2
]
Kalampokas, Nikolas
[1
,2
]
Hettlich, Vincent Hendrik
[1
,2
]
Sigetti, Dennis
[1
,2
]
Voss, Fabian
[2
,4
]
Dalyanoglu, Hannan
[1
,2
]
Aubin, Hug
[1
,2
]
Akhyari, Payam
[1
,2
,3
]
Lichtenberg, Artur
[1
,2
]
Boeken, Udo
[1
,2
,5
]
机构:
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Univ Hosp Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Med Fac, Dept Cardiac Surg, Aachen, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Med Fac, Div Cardiol Pulmonol & Angiol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[5] Moorenstr 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词:
cardiac allograft vasculopathy;
cytomegalovirus;
heart transplantation;
prophylaxis;
CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY;
INFECTION;
DISEASE;
REACTIVATION;
PREVENTION;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1002/iid3.1075
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after heart transplantation (HTx) can cause cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Consequently, monitoring and prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV-DNAemia) within the first weeks after HTx is recommended.Methods: All patients who underwent HTx between September 2010 and 2021 surviving the first 90 days (n = 196) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided on the prevalence of CMV-DNAemia during the first postoperative year after the end of the prophylaxis. A total of n = 35 (20.1%) developed CMV-DNAemia (CMV group) and were compared to patients without CMV-DNAemia (controls, n = 139). The remaining patients (n = 22) were excluded due to incomplete data.Results: Positive donors and negative recipients (D+/R-) and negative donors and positive recipients (D-/R+) serology was significantly increased and D-/R- decreased in the CMV group (p < .01). Furthermore, the mean age was 57.7 +/- 8.7 years but only 53.6 +/- 10.0 years for controls (p = .03). Additionally, the intensive care unit (p = .02) and total hospital stay (p = .03) after HTx were approximately 50% longer. Interestingly, the incidence of CMV-DNAemia during prophylaxis was only numerically increased in the CMV group (5.7%, respectively, 0.7%, p = .10), the same effect was also observed for postoperative infections. Multivariate analyses confirmed that D+/R- and D-/R+ CMV immunoglobulin G match were independent risk factors for postprophylaxis CMV-DNAemia.Conclusion: Our data should raise awareness of CMV-DNAemia after the termination of regular prophylaxis, as this affects one in five HTx patients. Especially old recipients as well as D+/R- and D-/R+ serology share an elevated risk of late CMV-DNAemia. For these patients, prolongation, or repetition of CMV prophylaxis, including antiviral drugs and CMV immunoglobulins, may be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文