Third-line treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective real-world study

被引:1
|
作者
Deng, Ting [1 ]
Duan, Jingjing [2 ]
Bai, Ming [2 ]
Zhang, Le [2 ]
Li, Hongli [2 ]
Liu, Rui [2 ]
Ning, Tao [2 ]
Ge, Shaohua [2 ]
Wang, Xia [2 ]
Yang, Yuchong [2 ]
Ji, Zhi [2 ]
Wang, Feixue [2 ]
Ba, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept GI Med Oncol,Canc Inst & Hosp,Key Lab Canc Pr, Huanhu West Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept GI Med Oncol, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Inst & Hosp,Key La, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
关键词
clinical outcomes; colorectal cancer; real-world evidence; third-line therapy; treatment patterns; FOLFOXIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; OPEN-LABEL; REVERSE SEQUENCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RAS MUTATIONS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE-II; CHEMOTHERAPY; OXALIPLATIN;
D O I
10.1177/20406223231197311
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background:There are multiple recommendations on the third-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, no consensus has been reached.Objectives:This study aimed to explore the patient demographics and the real-world third-line treatment landscape of mCRC.Design:A retrospective real-world cohort study.Methods:Electronic medical records of mCRC patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital between 2013 and 2020 were collected. Upon descriptive, comparative, and survival analyses, a retrospective study was conducted to describe demographics and clinical outcomes of mCRC patients receiving third-line treatment.Results:Among 218 mCRC patients receiving third-line therapy, 65.5% received chemotherapy combined with or without targeted drugs, followed by anti-angiogenic monotherapy (18.4%), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor drugs (6.9%) and immunotherapy (6.4%). The overall response rate and disease control rate reached 10.2% and 59.2%, respectively; and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.0 m and 10.7 m, respectively. After Cox multivariate analysis, we found that therapeutic regime was an independent prognostic factor. Compared to patients receiving anti-angiogenic monotherapy, those receiving chemotherapy combined with or without targeted drugs exhibited better prognosis. For patients whose PFS were longer in the front-line treatment, the PFS of third-line therapy was also relatively longer (p = 0.023). Multiple types of therapies (>3, p = 0.002) or multiple drugs (>5, p = 0.024) in the whole-course management of mCRC are indicators of longer survival.Conclusion:Chemotherapy combined with or without targeted therapy remained dominated third-line choice and showed favorable efficacy compared with anti-angiogenic monotherapy. With the application of more types and quantities of effective drugs, patients would achieve better survival.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimizing Administration of Third-Line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Prager, Gerald W.
    Ducreux, Michel
    Argiles, Guillem
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (12) : 1 - 20
  • [22] Patient demographics and management landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting: Real-world data in an Australian population
    Min, S. Tun
    Roohullah, A.
    Tognela, A.
    Jalali, A.
    Lee, M.
    Wong, R.
    Shapiro, J.
    Burge, M.
    Yip, D.
    Nott, L.
    Zimet, A.
    Lee, B.
    Dean, A.
    Steel, S.
    Wong, H-L.
    Gibbs, P.
    Lim, S. H-S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 : 247 - 247
  • [23] A real-world study: Efficacy of the third-line therapy of standard therapy versus rechallenge-chemotherapy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
    Xu, X.
    Fu, J.
    Xu, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S49 - S49
  • [24] Is there a third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer?
    Grothey, Axel
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 33 (06) : S36 - S38
  • [25] Third-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    van de Haar, Joris
    Valeri, Nicola
    Voest, Emile E.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 389 (02): : 190 - 191
  • [26] Third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    M. G. Gundgaard
    J. B. Soerensen
    E. Ehrnrooth
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2008, 61 : 1 - 13
  • [27] Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a German retrospective real-world analysis
    Niegisch, Guenter
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Hardtstock, Fraence
    Krieger, Julia
    Starry, Alexandra
    Osowski, Ulrike
    Guenther, Silke
    Deiters, Barthold
    Maywald, Ulf
    Wilke, Thomas
    Kearney, Mairead
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (19) : 1351 - 1366
  • [28] Third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Gundgaard, M. G.
    Soerensen, J. B.
    Ehrnrooth, E.
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 61 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [29] Chemotherapy re-use versus anti-angiogenic monotherapy as the third-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world cohort study
    Jingjing Duan
    Lila Zhu
    Yinghui Shi
    Weixue Wang
    Tongtong Wang
    Tao Ning
    Le Zhang
    Ming Bai
    Hongli Li
    Rui Liu
    Shaohua Ge
    Xia Wang
    Yuchong Yang
    Zhi Ji
    Feixue Wang
    Yansha Sun
    Yi Ba
    Ting Deng
    BMC Cancer, 24
  • [30] Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes associated with bevacizumab (bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Saverno, Kimberly
    Walker, Mark S.
    Hennessy, Daniel
    Dhawan, Ravinder
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)