The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in project portfolio selection: a literature review and future research directions

被引:32
作者
Kandakoglu, M. [1 ,2 ]
Walther, G. [1 ]
Ben Amor, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair Operat Management, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Ottawa, Telfer Sch Management, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; Integer programming; Project portfolio selection; Preference modeling; Alternative solutions; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; METAHEURISTIC APPROACH; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; SUPPORT; POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-023-05564-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In most project portfolio selection (PPS) situations, the presence of multiple attributes and decision-maker preference is inevitable. As Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods provide a framework well-suited to deal with these challenges in PPS problems, the use of MCDA methods in real-life PPS problems has increased in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review of the use of different MCDA methods and their individual or combined utilization with other modeling techniques to support PPS problems. First, we summarize how MCDA methods are used in different modeling approaches. Second, we examine the mathematical models that are generally used to combine MCDA with mathematical programming techniques to solve PPS problems with resource constraints. Third, we present the drawbacks of combined utilization and discuss recent advances. Finally, we visualize the summary of the reviewed papers as a decision tree to assist researchers and practitioners in the use of MCDA methods in a specific PPS context and propose some future research directions.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 830
页数:24
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Ahriz S, 2018, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V9, P88
[2]  
Almeida Adiel Teixeira de, 2011, Pesqui. Oper., V31, P301
[3]  
Almeida Jonatas A. de, 2014, Pesqui. Oper., V34, P275, DOI 10.1590/0101-7438.2014.034.02.0275
[4]   Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey [J].
Alvarez, Pavel Anselmo ;
Ishizaka, Alessio ;
Martinez, Luis .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 183
[5]   Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda [J].
Amor, Sarah Ben ;
Belaid, Fateh ;
Benkraiem, Ramzi ;
Ramdani, Boumediene ;
Guesmi, Khaled .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023, 325 (02) :771-793
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making
[7]   An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects [J].
Aragones-Beltran, Pablo ;
Chaparro-Gonzalez, Fidel ;
Pastor-Ferrando, Juan-Pascual ;
Pla-Rubio, Andrea .
ENERGY, 2014, 66 :222-238
[8]  
Archer N., 2004, The Wiley guide to managing projects, P237
[9]  
Archer N., 2007, The Wiley Guide to Project Program Portfolio Management pp, P94, DOI [10.1002/9780470172391.ch11, DOI 10.1002/9780470172391.CH11]
[10]   Robust portfolio decision analysis: An application to the energy research and development portfolio problem [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Salo, Ahti .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 284 (03) :1107-1120