Predictors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy detection and outcomes demonstration after conduction system pacing upgrade on patients with long-term persistent atrial fibrillation

ObjectiveTo identify the predictors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) and illustrate the safety and feasibility of conduction system pacing (CSP) upgrade on patients with long-term persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). MethodsAll patients with long-term persistent AF and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) & GE;50% were consecutively enrolled from January 2008 to December 2017, and all the patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) and high right ventricular pacing (RVP) percentage of at least 40%. The predictors of PICM were identified, and patients with PICM were followed up for at least 1 year regardless of CSP upgrade. Cardiac performances and lead outcomes were investigated in all patients before and after CSP upgrade. ResultsThe present study included 139 patients, out of which 37 (26.62%) developed PICM, resulting in a significant decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 56.11 & PLUSMN; 2.56% to 38.10 & PLUSMN; 5.81% (p< .01). The median duration for the development of PICM was 5.43 years. Lower LVEF (& LE;52.50%), longer paced QRS duration (& GE;175 ms), and higher RVP percentage (& GE;96.80%) were identified as independent predictors of PICM. Furthermore, the morbidity of PICM progressively increased with an increased number of predictors. The paced QRS duration (183.90 & PLUSMN; 22.34 ms vs. 136.57 & PLUSMN; 20.71 ms, p < .01), LVEF (39.35 & PLUSMN; 2.71% vs. 47.50 & PLUSMN; 7.43%, p < .01), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (55.53 & PLUSMN; 5.67 mm vs. 53.20 & PLUSMN; 5.78 mm, p = .03) improved significantly on patients accepting CSP upgrade. CSP responses and complete reverse remodeling (LVEF & GE;50% and LVEDD < 50 mm) were detected in 80.95% (17/21) and 42.9% (9/21) of patients. The pacing threshold (1.52 & PLUSMN; 0.78 V/0.4 ms vs. 1.27 & PLUSMN; 0.59 V/0.4 ms, p = .16) was stable after follow-up. ConclusionPICM is very common in patients with long-term persistent AF, and CSP upgrade was favorable for better cardiac performance in this patient population.