Overcoming Barriers to the Implementation of Integrated Musculoskeletal Pain Management Programs: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Study

被引:8
作者
Lentz, Trevor A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
-Smith, Jonathan Gonzalez [3 ,4 ]
Huber, Katie [3 ,4 ]
Goertz, Christine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bleser, William K. [3 ,4 ]
Saunders, Robert [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 300 W Morgan St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
关键词
Qualitative research; chronic pain; health care organizations and systems; integrated delivery systems; payment; CARE; OPIOIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Integrated pain management (IPM) programs can help to reduce the substantial population health burden of musculoskeletal pain, but are poorly implemented. Lessons learned from existing programs can inform efforts to expand IPM implementation. This qualitative study describes how health care systems, payers, providers, health policy researchers, and other stakeholders are overcoming barriers to developing and sustaining IPM programs in real-world settings. Primary data were collected February 2020 through September 2021 from a multi-sector expert panel of 25 stakeholders, 53 expert interviews representing 30 distinct IPM programs across the United States, and 4 original case studies of exemplar IPM programs. We use a consensual team-based approach to systematically analyze qualitative findings. We identified 4 major themes around challenges and potential solutions for implementing IPM programs: navigating coverage, payment, and reimbursement; enacting organizational change; making a business case to stakeholders; and overcoming regulatory hurdles. Strategies to address payment challenges included use of group visits, linked visits between billable and nonbillable providers, and development of value-based payment models. Organizational change strategies included engagement of clinical and administrative champions and co-location of services. Business case strategies involved demonstrating the ability to initially break even and potential to reduce downstream costs, while improving nonfinancial outcomes like patient satisfaction and provider burnout. Regulatory hurdles were overcome with innovative credentialing methods by leveraging available waivers and managed care contracting to expand access to IPM services. Lessons from existing programs provide direction on to grow and support such IPM delivery models across a variety of settings. Perspective: Integrated pain management (IPM) programs face numerous implementation challenges related to payment, organizational change, care coordination, and regulatory requirements. Drawing on real-world experiences of existing programs and from diverse IPM stakeholders, we outline actionable strategies that health care systems, providers, and payers can use to expand implementation of these programs. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 873
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Unintended consequences of United States chronic pain guidelines [J].
Adams, Kathleen ;
Guerra, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 43 (02) :313-317
[2]  
Adams W., 2015, Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, P492, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19, 10.1002/9781119171386.ch19]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Pain Management Best Practices Inter-Agency Task Force Report: Updates, Gaps, Inconsistencies, and Recommendations
[4]   Opioid Settlement Funds-Do Not Neglect Patients With Pain [J].
Bicket, Mark C. ;
McQuade, Barbara ;
Brummett, Chad M. .
JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2021, 2 (08)
[5]   ACO Serious Illness Care: Survey And Case Studies Depict Current Challenges And Future Opportunities [J].
Bleser, William K. ;
Saunders, Robert S. ;
Winfield, Lia ;
Japinga, Mark ;
Smith, Nathan ;
Kaufman, Brystana G. ;
Crook, Hannah L. ;
Muhlestein, David B. ;
McClellan, Mark .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (06) :1011-1020
[6]  
Bleser WK, 2022, Health Aff Forefront, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20220513.630666/full/, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20220513.630666/FULL]
[7]  
Bleser WK, ADV EQUITY VALUE BAS, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20221103.813959/full/, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20221103.813959/FULL]
[8]  
Bleser WK, 2022, Health Aff Forefront, DOI [10.1377/forefront.20220517.755520/full/, DOI 10.1377/FOREFRONT.20220517.755520/FULL]
[9]   Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence [J].
Blom, Ashley W. ;
Donovan, Richard L. ;
Beswick, Andrew D. ;
Whitehouse, Michael R. ;
Kunutsor, Setor K. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 374
[10]   Prescription opioid abuse in patients presenting for methadone maintenance treatment [J].
Brands, B ;
Blake, J ;
Sproule, B ;
Gourlay, D ;
Busto, U .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2004, 73 (02) :199-207