Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer

被引:5
作者
Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Abujamous, Lama [3 ]
Al-Azzam, Khansa [1 ]
Abu-Fares, Hala [1 ]
Hani, Hira Bani [1 ]
Alkyam, Mais [1 ]
Sharaf, Baha [1 ]
Elemian, Shatha [1 ]
Tamimi, Faris [1 ]
Abuhijla, Fawzi [4 ]
Edaily, Sarah [1 ]
Salama, Osama [1 ]
Abdulelah, Hazem [1 ]
Daoud, Rand [1 ]
Abubaker, Mohammad [1 ]
Al-Atary, Areej [5 ]
机构
[1] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Amman, Jordan
[3] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Cell Therapy & Appl Genom, Amman, Jordan
[4] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amman, Jordan
[5] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Nursing, Amman, Jordan
[6] Univ Jordan, King Hussein Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Queen Rania Al Abdullah St,POB 1269, Amman 11941, Jordan
来源
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
breast cancer; BRCA1; BRCA2; multigene panel; hereditary breast cancer; next generation sequencing; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; BREAST/OVARIAN CANCER; EARLY-ONSET; OLAPARIB;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S394092
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene Patients and Methods: Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain Results: A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age <= 45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in APC, TP53, CHEK2 and PALB2. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in BRCA1/2 genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2.Conclusion: Pathogenic mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to BRCA1/2. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer relapse prediction based on multi-gene RT-PCR algorithm
    Pluciennik, Elzbieta
    Krol, Maciej
    Nowakowska, Magdalena
    Kusinska, Renata
    Potemski, Piotr
    Kordek, Radzislaw
    Bednarek, Andrzej K.
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2010, 16 (03): : CR132 - CR136
  • [42] Implementation of an ontological reasoning to support the guideline-based management of primary breast cancer patients in the DESIREE project
    Bouaud, Jacques
    Pelayo, Sylvia
    Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
    Prebet, Coralie
    Ngo, Charlotte
    Teixeira, Luis
    Guezennec, Gilles
    Seroussi, Brigitte
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 108 (108)
  • [43] Genetic testing for breast cancer risk, from BRCA1/2 to a seven gene panel: an ethical analysis
    Erik Gustavsson
    Giovanni Galvis
    Niklas Juth
    BMC Medical Ethics, 21
  • [44] Genetic testing for breast cancer risk, fromBRCA1/2to a seven gene panel: an ethical analysis
    Gustavsson, Erik
    Galvis, Giovanni
    Juth, Niklas
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [45] Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing with Expanded Eligibility for Early Breast Cancer Patients in a Large Integrated Health System
    Shim, Veronica
    Karlea, Audrey
    Brenman, Leslie Manace
    Gul, Jamila
    Hoodfar, Elizabeth
    Chan, Tracy D.
    Engeman, Poline C.
    Sheldon, Vanessa M.
    Thorne-Hadfield, Deirdre M.
    Odele, Patience
    Vuong, Brooke
    McEvoy, Jennifer
    Chang, C. K.
    Kotak, Dinesh
    Habel, Laurel A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [46] Evaluating the utility of multi-gene, multi-disease population-based panel testing accounting for uncertainty in penetrance estimates
    Liang, Jane W.
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Green, Robert C.
    Kraft, Peter
    NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [47] Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan
    Hiroko Bando
    Breast Cancer, 2014, 21 : 656 - 663
  • [48] Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan
    Bando, Hiroko
    BREAST CANCER, 2014, 21 (06) : 656 - 663
  • [49] Genetic counseling and genetic testing for pathogenic germline mutations among high-risk patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer: a traceback approach
    Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat
    Tamimi, Faris
    Iweir, Sereen
    Sharaf, Baha
    Abdel-Razeq, Sarah
    Salama, Osama
    Edaily, Sarah
    Hani, Hira Bani
    Azzam, Khansa
    Abaza, Haneen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge
    Bono, M.
    Fanale, D.
    Incorvaia, L.
    Cancelliere, D.
    Fiorino, A.
    Calo, V.
    Dimino, A.
    Filorizzo, C.
    Corsini, L. R.
    Brando, C.
    Madonia, G.
    Cucinella, A.
    Scalia, R.
    Barraco, N.
    Guadagni, F.
    Pedone, E.
    Badalamenti, G.
    Russo, A.
    Bazan, V.
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (04)