Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Abujamous, Lama [3 ]
Al-Azzam, Khansa [1 ]
Abu-Fares, Hala [1 ]
Hani, Hira Bani [1 ]
Alkyam, Mais [1 ]
Sharaf, Baha [1 ]
Elemian, Shatha [1 ]
Tamimi, Faris [1 ]
Abuhijla, Fawzi [4 ]
Edaily, Sarah [1 ]
Salama, Osama [1 ]
Abdulelah, Hazem [1 ]
Daoud, Rand [1 ]
Abubaker, Mohammad [1 ]
Al-Atary, Areej [5 ]
机构
[1] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Amman, Jordan
[3] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Cell Therapy & Appl Genom, Amman, Jordan
[4] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amman, Jordan
[5] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Nursing, Amman, Jordan
[6] Univ Jordan, King Hussein Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Queen Rania Al Abdullah St,POB 1269, Amman 11941, Jordan
来源
BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
breast cancer; BRCA1; BRCA2; multigene panel; hereditary breast cancer; next generation sequencing; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; BREAST/OVARIAN CANCER; EARLY-ONSET; OLAPARIB;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S394092
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene Patients and Methods: Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain Results: A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age <= 45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in APC, TP53, CHEK2 and PALB2. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in BRCA1/2 genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2.Conclusion: Pathogenic mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to BRCA1/2. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Germline variants detected by multigene panel testing in patients with suspected hereditary breast cancer
    Togashi, Yusa
    Nagahashi, Masayuki
    Kashima, Mina
    Okada, Chiho
    Kinjo, Chinatsu
    Miyazaki, Ayako
    Ueda, Mako
    Tsubamoto, Hiroshi
    Sawai, Hideaki
    Miyoshi, Yasuo
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025,
  • [22] Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
    Yoo, Jaeeun
    Lee, Gun Dong
    Kim, Jee Hae
    Lee, Seung Nam
    Chae, Hyojin
    Han, Eunhee
    Kim, Yonggoo
    Kim, Myungshin
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 40 (02) : 152 - 158
  • [23] Multi-gene classifiers for prediction of recurrence in breast cancer patients
    Yasuto Naoi
    Shinzaburo Noguchi
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 12 - 18
  • [24] Psychological and health behaviour outcomes following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: a mini-review of the literature
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Thain, Emily
    Gillies, Brittany
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [25] Multi-Gene Panel Testing of 23,179 Individuals for Hereditary Cancer Risk Identifies Pathogenic Variant Carriers Missed by Current Genetic Testing Guidelines
    Neben, Cynthia L.
    Zimmer, Anjali D.
    Stedden, Will
    van den Akker, Jeroen
    O'Connor, Robert
    Chan, Raymond C.
    Chen, Elaine
    Tan, Zheng
    Leon, Annette
    Ji, Jack
    Topper, Scott
    Zhou, Alicia Y.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2019, 21 (04) : 646 - 657
  • [26] Psychological and health behaviour outcomes following multi-gene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk: a mini-review of the literature
    Lindsay Carlsson
    Emily Thain
    Brittany Gillies
    Kelly Metcalfe
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 20
  • [27] Multi-gene classifiers for prediction of recurrence in breast cancer patients
    Naoi, Yasuto
    Noguchi, Shinzaburo
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [28] Multi-Gene Testing Overview with a Clinical Perspective in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Dameri, Martina
    Ferrando, Lorenzo
    Cirmena, Gabriella
    Vernieri, Claudio
    Pruneri, Giancarlo
    Ballestrero, Alberto
    Zoppoli, Gabriele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (13)
  • [29] Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening
    Frey, Melissa K.
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Bassett, Rebecca Yee
    Martineau, Jessica
    Dalton, Emily
    Chern, Jing-Yi
    Blank, Stephanie V.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (02) : 211 - 215
  • [30] Screening of over 1000 Indian patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer with a multi-gene panel: prevalence of BRCA1/2 and non-BRCA mutations
    Jaya Singh
    Nishita Thota
    Suhasini Singh
    Shila Padhi
    Puja Mohan
    Shivani Deshwal
    Soumit Sur
    Mithua Ghosh
    Amit Agarwal
    Ramesh Sarin
    Rosina Ahmed
    Sachin Almel
    Basumita Chakraborti
    Vinod Raina
    Praveen K. DadiReddy
    B. K. Smruti
    Senthil Rajappa
    Chandragouda Dodagoudar
    Shyam Aggarwal
    Manish Singhal
    Ashish Joshi
    Rajeev Kumar
    Ajai Kumar
    Deepak K. Mishra
    Neeraj Arora
    Aarati Karaba
    Satish Sankaran
    Shanmukh Katragadda
    Arunabha Ghosh
    Vamsi Veeramachaneni
    Ramesh Hariharan
    Ashraf U. Mannan
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 170 : 189 - 196