New idea for determining the optimal number of measurements in absorbed dose-to-water measurement of high-energy photon beam

被引:0
作者
Tsuno, Hayato [1 ]
Sasaki, Koji [1 ]
Matsubayashi, Fumiyasu [2 ]
Koyama, Tomio [3 ]
Oosaka, Akitane [4 ]
Sakamoto, Masataka [5 ]
Hosoki, Kazunori [6 ]
Suzuki, Hidekazu [7 ]
Okano, Emiko [8 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Prefectural Coll Hlth Sci, Grad Sch Radiol Technol, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
[2] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Radiat Therapy, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Nagano Red Cross Hosp, Japanese Red Cross Soc, Dept Radiol, Nagano, Japan
[4] Niigata Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Niigata, Japan
[5] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[6] Tonan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hokkaidou, Japan
[7] Univ Yamanashi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yamanashi, Japan
[8] Fujiyoshida Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yamanashi, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncac262
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study presents a new idea for estimating the number of measurements required for determining the uncertainty in obtaining the desired water absorbed dose using the variation obtained from multicenter absorbed dose measurement data. The number of dose measurements depends on the performance of each linear accelerator (LINAC) tested and the dosimetry equipment and procedure used. However, optimising the number of data collected for the absorbed dose to water has been inadequately reported. Using the absorbed dose measurement data collected 10 times as a reference value, we will compare the changes in the variation of the measurement results caused by the difference in the number of repeated measurements of the absorbed dose. The number of measurements is determined statistically such that this variation would be smaller than the change in absorbed dose. Thus, we can determine the optimum number of measurements suitable for the variability of each LINAC.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 253
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[2]   EFFECTS OF DOSIMETRIC AND CLINICAL UNCERTAINTY ON COMPLICATION-FREE LOCAL TUMOR-CONTROL [J].
BOYER, AL ;
SCHULTHEISS, T .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (01) :65-71
[3]  
Chao K.S. C., 2005, Practical Essentials of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, V2nd
[4]   AAPM Task Group 198 Report: An implementation guide for TG 142 quality assurance of medical accelerators [J].
Hanley, Joseph ;
Dresser, Sean ;
Simon, William ;
Flynn, Ryan ;
Klein, Eric E. ;
Letourneau, Daniel ;
Liu, Chihray ;
Yin, Fang-Fang ;
Arjomandy, Bijan ;
Ma, Lijun ;
Aguirre, Francisco ;
Jones, Jimmy ;
Bayouth, John ;
Holmes, Todd .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) :E830-E885
[5]  
Japan Society of Medical Physics, 2012, STAND DOS ABS DOS WA
[6]   Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators [J].
Klein, Eric E. ;
Hanley, Joseph ;
Bayouth, John ;
Yin, Fang-Fang ;
Simon, William ;
Dresser, Sean ;
Serago, Christopher ;
Aguirre, Francisco ;
Ma, Lijun ;
Arjomandy, Bijan ;
Liu, Chihray ;
Sandin, Carlos ;
Holmes, Todd .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (09) :4197-4212
[7]   Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams [J].
McEwen, Malcolm ;
DeWerd, Larry ;
Ibbott, Geoffrey ;
Followill, David ;
Rogers, David W. O. ;
Seltzer, Stephen ;
Seuntjens, Jan .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (04)
[8]  
Papanikolaou N., 2004, MED PHYS, DOI [10.37206/86, DOI 10.37206/86]
[9]   Report of AAPM Task Group 219 on independent calculation-based dose/MU verification for IMRT [J].
Zhu, Timothy C. ;
Stathakis, Sotiris ;
Clark, Jennifer R. ;
Feng, Wenzheng ;
Georg, Dietmar ;
Holmes, Shannon M. ;
Kry, Stephen F. ;
Ma, Chang-Ming Charlie ;
Miften, Moyed ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Moran, Jean M. ;
Papanikolaou, Niko ;
Poppe, Bjorn ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) :E808-E829