Structure, Agency, and Structural Reform: The Case of the European Central Bank

被引:12
作者
Braun, Benjamin [1 ]
Di Carlo, Donato [2 ,3 ]
Diessner, Sebastian [4 ]
Duesterhoeft, Maximilian [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Study Soc, Cologne, Germany
[2] Luiss Univ, Polit Econ, Rome, Italy
[3] Luiss Hub New Ind Policy LUHNIP, Rome, Italy
[4] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Univ Dresden, Econ, Dresden, Germany
[6] Telekom MMS, Data Sci & text analyt, Dresden, Germany
关键词
Monetary integration; labor market policy; social protection; central bank power; euro area; MONETARY INTEGRATION; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CRISIS; POLICY; IDEAS; POWER; INDEPENDENCE; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; UNION;
D O I
10.1017/S1537592723002992
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Monetary and financial integration has been shown to increase the pressure on states to liberalize social and labor market policies. If structures do not come with instruction sheets, how do monetary regime pressures translate into policy? Through a case study of the euro area, we show that central banks play an underappreciated role in this process. Using mixed methods to analyze a large amount of data, including the complete corpus of speeches, we trace the evolution of the European Central Bank's advocacy for structural reforms between 1999 and 2019. To explain the ECB's activism in a policy area beyond its mandate, we theorize the ECB as navigating a dilemma between governability and legitimacy. Handed a monetary regime under which flexible labor markets were seen as a condition for governability, the ECB saw no alternative but to push governments toward structural reforms, despite the reputational risks. The ECB ended its advocacy when increasing political backlash coincided with a structural regime shift from an inflationary to a deflationary environment.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Akbik Adina., 2022, The European Parliament as an Accountability Forum: Overseeing the Economic and Monetary Union, DOI [10.1017/9781108886611, DOI 10.1017/9781108886611]
[2]   The Side Effects of Central Bank Independence [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Kern, Andreas .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 65 (04) :971-987
[3]  
Alesina A, 1998, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P197
[4]   Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes versus Spending [J].
Alesina, Alberto ;
Ardagna, Silvia .
TAX POLICY AND THE ECONOMY, VOL 24, 2010, 24 :35-68
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, The Uses of Social Investment, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780198790488.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ACCOUNT MONETARY POL
[7]   Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries: Does the deregulatory view hold water? [J].
Baccaro, Lucio ;
Rei, Diego .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2007, 61 (03) :527-569
[8]  
Baccaro Lucio, 2017, Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation: European Industrial Relations since the 1970s, DOI [10.1017/9781139088381, DOI 10.1017/9781139088381]
[9]   Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Institutions [J].
Baccini, Leonardo ;
Guidi, Mattia ;
Poletti, Arlo ;
Yildirim, Aydin B. .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2022, 76 (01) :70-104
[10]   The professional politics of the austerity debate: A comparative field analysis of the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund [J].
Ban, Cornel ;
Patenaude, Bryan .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 97 (03) :530-545