Thermal, structural and spectroscopic properties of powder sheep milk obtained by different drying methods

被引:3
|
作者
Conceicao, Daniele Gomes [1 ]
Reis, Lucas Caiafa Cardoso [1 ]
Virgens, Ermando da Silva [1 ]
de Jesus, Josane Cardim [1 ]
Bauer, Luciana Carolina [1 ]
Chaves, Modesto Antonio [1 ]
Bonomo, Renata Cristina Ferreira [1 ]
Santos, Leandro Soares [1 ]
Ferra, Sibelli Passini Barbosa [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Southwest Bahia UESB, Grad Program Food Sci & Engn, Rodovia BR 415,Km 03 S-N, BR-45700000 Itapetinga, BA, Brazil
关键词
DRIED CAMEL MILK; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; WHEY PROTEINS; SPRAY; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105845
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The thermal, microstructural and spectroscopic properties of sheep's milk powder submitted to atomisation and freeze-drying were evaluated. Composition analysis, mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermal analysis were performed. The MIR spectra showed similar vibration modes associated with each peak, but with a difference in absorption intensity. The SEM images revealed that the milk powder obtained by the atomisation method produced particles with a spherical and wrinkled shape, while the particles obtained by the freeze-drying method showed a continuous structure. Thermal analysis indicated one endothermic peak and four exothermic peaks for atomised milks, while for freeze-dried milks one endothermic peak and three exothermic peaks. MIR analysis showed that the milk powder obtained through atomisation had higher contents than the milk obtained through freeze-drying. This confirms that the atomisation method is more suitable for obtaining milk powder, mainly because it is a cost-effective technique compared with freeze-drying.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT DRYING CONDITIONS ON POWDER PROPERTIES AND PROCESSING CHARACTERISTICS
    MILNE, SJ
    MOSTAGHACI, H
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 1990, 130 (02): : 263 - 271
  • [42] Effects of different drying methods on the storage stability of barley grass powder
    Liu, Ying
    Chen, Weifeng
    Fan, Liuping
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2022, 102 (03) : 1076 - 1084
  • [43] Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Micronized Chinese Wolfberry Powder
    Guangpeng LIU
    Juan WANG
    Fengtao ZHU
    Yan ZHAO
    Bangguo GE
    Peini ZHAO
    Fatao HE
    Medicinal Plant, 2017, (04) : 27 - 31
  • [44] SPECIFIC SURFACE AREAS OF MILK POWDERS PRODUCED BY DIFFERENT DRYING METHODS
    BERLIN, E
    HOWARD, NM
    PALLANSCH, MJ
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1964, 47 (02) : 132 - &
  • [45] EFFECT OF DRYING CONDITIONS ON SOME PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF MILK PERMEATE POWDER
    ABDELSALAM, MH
    ELSHIBINY, S
    ELATRIBY, H
    MILCHWISSENSCHAFT-MILK SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1984, 39 (08): : 458 - 460
  • [46] Breakage of infant milk formula through three different processing methods and its influence on powder properties
    Han J.
    Fitzpatrick J.
    Cronin K.
    Maidannyk V.
    Miao S.
    Journal of Food Engineering, 2020, 282
  • [47] OPTIMIZATION OF SPRAY DRYING FOR COCONUT MILK POWDER USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY AND INVESTIGATION OF THE POWDER PROPERTIES
    George, Sony
    Thomas, Anish
    Ghodke, Praveen Kumar
    Kumar, Malladi V. Pavan
    CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 14 (04) : 114 - 128
  • [48] Structural-phase state and properties of film compounds obtained by different methods of physical deposition
    Ignatenko, P. I.
    PHYSICS OF METALS AND METALLOGRAPHY, 2008, 105 (04): : 383 - 389
  • [49] Structural-phase state and properties of film compounds obtained by different methods of physical deposition
    P. I. Ignatenko
    The Physics of Metals and Metallography, 2008, 105 : 383 - 389
  • [50] Milk yield and milking traits measured with different methods in Bafra sheep
    Unal, N.
    Akcapinar, H.
    Atasoy, F.
    Yakan, A.
    Ugurlu, M.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 2008, 159 (10) : 494 - 501