Creative Subprocess Frequencies and Their Relation to Personal Characteristics and Product Creativity: Insights from a Drawing Task Think Aloud Study

被引:2
作者
Boldt, Gregory T. [1 ,2 ]
Kaufman, James C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Neag Sch Educ, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
creativity; creative process; divergent thinking; convergent thinking; think aloud; drawing; DIVERGENT THINKING; ARTISTIC CREATIVITY; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; BLIND VARIATION; MODEL; METACOGNITION; PROTOCOL; THOUGHT; INVOLVEMENT; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1002/jocb.629
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Most research on the creative process has focused on idea generation, and the prevalence and influence of many other creative subprocesses remain poorly understood. To clarify different subprocesses' respective roles in creative work, this study investigated their frequencies and associations with creativity-related personal characteristics and product creativity. Undergraduate students (n = 266) articulated their creative thought processes via the think aloud method while completing an open-ended drawing task and completed questionnaires assessing creativity-relevant personal characteristics. Drawings were rated for creativity by quasi-expert judges. Transcripts were coded using an a priori coding scheme informed by models of the creative process, including generation (14%), elaboration (26%), association (9%), selection (4%), evaluation (13%), anchoring (13%), metacognition (7%), and filler (14%). Subprocess frequencies correlated minimally with measures of personal characteristics, although several significant, albeit weak, relationships emerged. A hierarchical regression analysis indicated that the best predictors of drawing creativity were aesthetic fluency, the frequency of anchoring, time spent on task, and, marginally, the frequency of generation. Together, these results provide insight into how relevant personal characteristics and subprocess engagement contribute to drawing creativity and highlight the particular importance of anchoring, which involves monitoring and refining task-related goals and constraints, throughout the creative process.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]   Creativity and Well-being: A Meta-analysis [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Tadik, Harun ;
Myers, Danielle ;
Van der Sman, Carian ;
Uysal, Recep .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2021, 55 (03) :738-751
[2]  
Amabile T. M., 1996, CREATIVITY CONTEXT U
[3]   The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning [J].
Amabile, Teresa M. ;
Pratt, Michael G. .
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36, 2016, 36 :157-183
[5]   Reflection in the Creative Process of Early Adolescents: The Mediating Roles of Creative Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Concept [J].
Anderson, Ross C. ;
Haney, Michele .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2021, 15 (04) :612-626
[6]  
Baer J., 2017, Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains, P8, DOI [10.1017/9781316274385.002, DOI 10.1017/9781316274385.002]
[7]  
Baer J., 2009, Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education, DOI [10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004, DOI 10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.CH004]
[8]   Bridging Generality and Specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of Creativity [J].
Baer, John ;
Kaufman, James C. .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2005, 27 (03) :158-163
[9]  
Barbot B, 2015, EDUC 3-13, V43, P371, DOI 10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643
[10]   The Effect of the Sequence of Creative Processes on the Quality of the Ideas: The Benefit of a Simultaneous Focus on Originality and Feasibility [J].
Baruah, Jonali ;
Paulus, Paul B. ;
Kohn, Nicholas W. .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2021, 55 (04) :946-961