Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zichen [1 ]
Li, Mingrui [1 ]
Ji, Haixia [1 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Sang, Aimin [1 ]
Cheng, Xinliang [1 ]
Li, Jun [2 ]
Yu, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Med Sch, Eye Inst, Affiliated Hosp, 20 Xisi Rd, Nantong City 226001, Jiangsu Provinc, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Nantong Peoples Hosp 1, Dept Dermatol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Nantong 226001, Peoples R China
关键词
Opaque bubble layer; Femtosecond laser; LASIK; SMILE; OPAQUE BUBBLE LAYER; INCISION LENTICULE EXTRACTION; FEMTOSECOND LASER; FLAP CREATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-023-06336-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).MethodsA total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: "OBL" groups and "no OBL" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into "hard OBL" and "soft OBL" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.ResultsIn the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (beta = 0.126, P = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (P = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (beta = 0.195, P = 0.024; beta = 0.281, P = 0.001).ConclusionThe incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ray-tracing-Guided or Q-Value-Adjusted FS-LASIK for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Comparative Contralateral Eye Study
    Yuan, Yifei
    Zhang, Ruiyu
    Wang, Zizhen
    Wang, Yuexin
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Yueguo
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 40 (11) : e804 - e813
  • [32] A comparative and prospective study of corneal biomechanics after SMILE and FS-LASIK performed on the contralateral eyes of high myopia patients
    He, Shengyu
    Luo, Yiqi
    Ye, Yiming
    Chen, Pei
    Liu, Chang
    Lei, Lei
    Zhuang, Jing
    Yu, Keming
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (13)
  • [33] Study of corneal and retinal thicknesses at five years after FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia (vol 24, 396, 2024)
    Li, Jiayu
    Qin, Jie
    Lv, Xiaotong
    Xu, Yushan
    Jiang, Dianjun
    Yuan, Mingzhen
    Sun, Mingshen
    Zhang, Fengju
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Biomechanical Effects of tPRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE on the Cornea
    Xin, Yue
    Lopes, Bernardo T.
    Wang, JunJie
    Wu, Jie
    Zhu, ManMan
    Jiang, MuChen
    Miao, YuanYuan
    Lin, HuiNi
    Cao, Si
    Zheng, XiaoBo
    Eliasy, Ashkan
    Chen, ShiHao
    Wang, QinMei
    Ye, YuFeng
    Bao, FangJun
    Elsheikh, Ahmed
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [35] Changes in Intraocular Pressure and Factors that Influence such Changes after FS-LASIK and SMILE
    Kim, Bu Ki
    Chung, Young Taek
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 62 (10): : 1355 - 1363
  • [36] Comparison of Corneal Optical Quality After SMILE, Wavefront-Optimized LASIK and Topography-Guided LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism
    Zhang, Yu
    Sun, Xiaoxiao
    Chen, Yueguo
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [37] Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes Following Femtosecond LaserAssisted LASIK With SMILE in Patients With Myopia or Myopic Astigmatism
    Ganesh, Sri
    Gupta, Rishika
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (09) : 590 - U18
  • [38] Comparison of myopic astigmatic correction after cross-assisted SMILE, FS-LASIK, and transPRK
    Yang, Yi-Zeng
    Li, Fen-Fen
    Wu, Shuang-Qing
    Dai, Qi
    Bao, Fang-Jun
    Cheng, Dan
    Zhu, Jun
    Ye, Yu-Feng
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 49 (12) : 1242 - 1248
  • [39] Dry Eye Disease following Refractive Surgery: A 12-Month Follow-Up of SMILE versus FS-LASIK in High Myopia
    Wang, Bingjie
    Naidu, Rajeev K.
    Chu, Renyuan
    Dai, Jinhui
    Qu, Xiaomei
    Zhou, Hao
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [40] Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK
    Han Tian
    Xu Ye
    Han Xiao
    Shang Jianmin
    Zeng Li
    Zhou Xingtao
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2020, 18 (01)